Apolyton Archive  |  Preserved copy of the Apolyton Civilization Site forums as they ran on Ultimate Bulletin Board, 1998–2001. Read-only; nothing here can be posted to or replied to.  |  Forum index |  About this archive |  The 2005 site & forums

  Apolyton Civilization Site Forums
  Civ3-General/Suggestions
  Anyone heard about city razing?

Post New Topic  Post A ReplyPost A Reply In A New Window

profile | register | preferences | faq | search next newest topic | next oldest topic bottom of page
Author
Topic:   Anyone heard about city razing? Format for Better Printing
CGreen
Chieftain
Victoria, BC Canada
Jul 1999
posted May 15, 2001 18:29   Click Here to See the Profile for CGreenClick Here to Email CGreen  send a private message to CGreen
Edit/Delete Message    Reply To And Quote This Message
IP: Logged, Admin Access Only
In SMAC, one of the nicest features was the ability to completely destroy an enemy city instead of capturing it. This helps a great deal when trying to build a "utopia"- evenly spacing your cities, that is.

Has there been any discussion on this feature? I'm tired of having to poison cities with spies in order to remove them.

Of course, it's death to you culturally unless you have Fundamentalism.

Mister Pleasant
Chieftain
New Orleans
Jan 2001
posted May 16, 2001 03:06   Click Here to See the Profile for Mister Pleasant   send a private message to Mister Pleasant
Edit/Delete Message    Reply To And Quote This Message
IP: Logged, Admin Access Only
In this day and age, razing cities will get you in trouble also. Still, should be a possibility - as should disband (ala CTP).
Pingu:
Settler
Reading, England
Jan 2001
posted May 16, 2001 08:40   Click Here to See the Profile for Pingu:   send a private message to Pingu:
Edit/Delete Message    Reply To And Quote This Message
IP: Logged, Admin Access Only
I think there should be a scale of this, and you get the option to choose which you commit.
Starting with a "nice" occupation, where not much happens. Nice modern warfare does this, and the more genteel sort of colonist too. Your invading troops should not be repaired if you do this. You probalby should need an advance to be able to control your troops this well. Nationalsim perhap?

Next up comes the looting and sacking of a city. Most historical conflict has this in in it, think Constantinople/Istanbul. In modern times it is a farily hefty atrocity and only dictators like Milosovic and Saddam Hussein will risk the uproar this will cause. The city is still there, but you refresh your troops "life bar" and morale by letting them go nuts on a few unsuspecting citizens, and steeling all the food, so causing the city itself alot of damage, but it's still there. Civil wars will tend to do this to you, Rwanda being a good example... Perhaps if you have the UN, your High Commission for Refugees can do this under the auspices of resettlement, reducing the atrocity factor.

After that comes the complete razing of the city, the city is reduced to ash, and the feilds sown with salt. All citizens are dead. This is an atrocity no matter what the era is.

Pingu:

Apolyton Civilization Site Forums
> > > Civ3-General/Suggestions Forum

next newest topic | next oldest topictop of page

All times are EDT

Administrative Options: Close Topic | Archive/Move | Delete Topic | Top
Post New Topic  Post A ReplyPost A Reply In A New Window
Hop to:

Contact Us
Apolyton Civilization Site

Powered by: Ultimate Bulletin Board, Version 5.44a
© Infopop Corporation (formerly Madrona Park, Inc.), 1998 - 2000.

AltaVista Type or paste text or Web address (beginning with http://) here:
Powered
by Systran
Translate from: 

Front Page | Civilization III | Dinosaurs | Civilization II | Call to Power | Call to Power II | Alpha Centauri | Alternative Civs | Misc | Links | About ACS | GameStats
GameLeague | Scenario League | HAC | Civilization Scenario Collection | Spanish CivII Site | Clash of Civs | CtP Maps | Art of War | WesW's Ctp1/2 Site