Apolyton Archive  |  Preserved copy of the Apolyton Civilization Site forums as they ran on Ultimate Bulletin Board, 1998–2001. Read-only; nothing here can be posted to or replied to.  |  Forum index |  About this archive |  The 2005 site & forums

  Apolyton Civilization Site Forums
  Civ3-General/Suggestions
  UN Victory!

Post New Topic  Post A ReplyPost A Reply In A New Window

profile | register | preferences | faq | search next newest topic | next oldest topic bottom of page
Author
Topic:   UN Victory! Format for Better Printing
Imran Siddiqui
ACS News Editor
Deity
b.02-15-99
posted May 14, 2001 16:09   Click Here to See the Profile for Imran SiddiquiClick Here to Email Imran Siddiqui  send a private message to Imran SiddiquiSend a Message to UIN: 15858938 Visit Imran Siddiqui's Homepage!
Edit/Delete Message    Reply To And Quote This Message
IP: Logged, Admin Access Only
Acording to Gamespot UK:

quote:

There's also a UN victory: in the latter stages of the game, any player who can persuade all other civilizations to nominate them as the UN Secretary General will triumph.

COOL! Does that mean there will be a UN kind of like SMAC's council? That would be great! You can declare sanctions against a country, etc.

paiktis22
Prince
Athens Greece
Oct 2000
posted May 14, 2001 16:19   Click Here to See the Profile for paiktis22   send a private message to paiktis22 Visit paiktis22's Homepage!
Edit/Delete Message    Reply To And Quote This Message
IP: Logged, Admin Access Only
Yeah, nice addition.

Although I shiver to think how much money I will have to pay to every member country in order to choose me as their leader. (lobbying )

JamesJKirk
Prince
Dixon, CA USA
b.02-15-99
posted May 14, 2001 16:23   Click Here to See the Profile for JamesJKirkClick Here to Email JamesJKirk  send a private message to JamesJKirk
Edit/Delete Message    Reply To And Quote This Message
IP: Logged, Admin Access Only
Well then I guess you can at least be happy that there're only 8 civs you have to bribe instead of more
EnochF
Prince
Seattle, WA
b.02-15-99
posted May 14, 2001 17:29   Click Here to See the Profile for EnochFClick Here to Email EnochF  send a private message to EnochF
Edit/Delete Message    Reply To And Quote This Message
IP: Logged, Admin Access Only
Can we vote to melt the polar ice caps?
Darkknight
Warlord
Ireland,Galway,Athenry
Nov 2000
posted May 14, 2001 17:42   Click Here to See the Profile for DarkknightClick Here to Email Darkknight  send a private message to DarkknightSend a Message to UIN: 96951342 Visit Darkknight's Homepage!
Edit/Delete Message    Reply To And Quote This Message
IP: Logged, Admin Access Only
YEAH!! that was about the one good difference between SMAC and civ2!!
Adm.Naismith
Prince
Milano - Italy
Oct 1999
posted May 14, 2001 17:54   Click Here to See the Profile for Adm.Naismith   send a private message to Adm.Naismith Visit Adm.Naismith's Homepage!
Edit/Delete Message    Reply To And Quote This Message
IP: Logged, Admin Access Only
quote:

Originally posted by EnochF on 05-14-2001 05:29 PM
Can we vote to melt the polar ice caps?

Sure! Mr. George W.Bush did it some weeks ago in real world.

------------------
Admiral Naismith AKA mcostant

Captain
Settler
Kingston, Ontario
May 2001
posted May 14, 2001 21:06   Click Here to See the Profile for Captain   send a private message to Captain
Edit/Delete Message    Reply To And Quote This Message
IP: Logged, Admin Access Only
I sure hope this isn't like most games version of "elect the supreme leader". Those usually depend on gaining the most votes based on increasing your population (and thus industrial/economic base and thus power) - which really isn't a diplomatic victory, it's just another "production/industrial capacity" race. Basically the same thing as how to win militarily or the space race since you need production for both.

I'm not sure how to achieve a diplomatic solution, especially with stupid AI, but one idea might be to make better use of the reputation concept. Keep a stainless or less stained reputation, as well as being well-liked in the present.

Another idea might be that to win, you don't need to be just elected once BUT once elected you must 'prove' your worth as leader by leading the planet for say 10-20 turns or so and substantially improve a certain aspect of society or something- maybe prevent all wars by diplomacy for 10 yrs, or reduce poverty by 50% or pollution by 50%(eg. reinforce Kyoto protocals) or something like that?

OR, another idea might be to get all the countries to unite to build a MEGAWONDER. (e.g. the ISS, I know some people don't like it and call it a waste, but if its scientific/economic return is poor, its diplomatic rewards are substantial).
First task is to get all these competing countries to agree to build it, and then you have to make sure they complete their agreement without killing each other.

what do you think?

JamesJKirk
Prince
Dixon, CA USA
b.02-15-99
posted May 14, 2001 21:29   Click Here to See the Profile for JamesJKirkClick Here to Email JamesJKirk  send a private message to JamesJKirk
Edit/Delete Message    Reply To And Quote This Message
IP: Logged, Admin Access Only
I'm sure that since culture plays such a role in the game, it will for the diplomatic ending as well
Theben
Emperor
BK Heaven
b.02-15-99
posted May 15, 2001 03:06   Click Here to See the Profile for ThebenClick Here to Email Theben  send a private message to Theben
Edit/Delete Message    Reply To And Quote This Message
IP: Logged, Admin Access Only
As long as you need EVERY other nation's support to be elected UN Secretary General, it should okay. It shouldn't be modeled on SMAC's population percentages (since you could vote yourself in with every other nation at war with you), and if all nations aren't needed then the naysayers should declare all-out war on you and the game won't end until you or they are gone.

I also think that "keeping the peace" or proving your worthiness in some fashion for x # of turns after elected might be a good idea.

Grumbold
Prince
London, UK
Mar 2000
posted May 15, 2001 09:20   Click Here to See the Profile for Grumbold   send a private message to Grumbold
Edit/Delete Message    Reply To And Quote This Message
IP: Logged, Admin Access Only
I like the idea of a diplomatic win if you befriend absolutely everybody and can persuade them to agree with each other, too (the main reason why some countries oppose motions is because their hated enemy supports it, irrespective of its merit.) I would not like to see the UN able to issue damaging sanctions of any kind just through majority voting however. It should be a victory solution, not another way to fight your enemies.
Apolyton Civilization Site Forums
> > > Civ3-General/Suggestions Forum

next newest topic | next oldest topictop of page

All times are EDT

Administrative Options: Close Topic | Archive/Move | Delete Topic | Top
Post New Topic  Post A ReplyPost A Reply In A New Window
Hop to:

Contact Us
Apolyton Civilization Site

Powered by: Ultimate Bulletin Board, Version 5.44a
© Infopop Corporation (formerly Madrona Park, Inc.), 1998 - 2000.

AltaVista Type or paste text or Web address (beginning with http://) here:
Powered
by Systran
Translate from: 

Front Page | Civilization III | Dinosaurs | Civilization II | Call to Power | Call to Power II | Alpha Centauri | Alternative Civs | Misc | Links | About ACS | GameStats
GameLeague | Scenario League | HAC | Civilization Scenario Collection | Spanish CivII Site | Clash of Civs | CtP Maps | Art of War | WesW's Ctp1/2 Site