|
Author
|
|
Topic: General/Military Spending |  |
|
ancient
Chieftain
Rochester, N.Y. (worst place in the world)
May 2001
|
 |
posted May 06, 2001 09:01
   | 
 |
 |  |
rrrrrr...
[This message has been edited by ancient (edited May 06, 2001).] |
Lawrence of Arabia
Warlord
San Francisco, CA, USA
Apr 2001
|
 |
posted May 06, 2001 15:13
 |
|
| |
This has already been addressed. After every battle, you have a chance of getting a great leader who can change the outcome of many battles to come. You have a few options with him i think.Instead of posting stupid threads, go read the firaxis website. This topic has already been addressed. ------------------
Its okay to smile; you're in America now |
ancient
Chieftain
Rochester, N.Y. (worst place in the world)
May 2001
|
|
posted May 06, 2001 21:06
|
|
| |
umm its not the same.. |
Bubba
Chieftain
b.02-15-99
|
|
posted May 06, 2001 21:17
|
|
| |
Lawrence of Arabia, why do you feel the need to be so rude?
|
ancient
Chieftain
Rochester, N.Y. (worst place in the world)
May 2001
|
|
posted May 06, 2001 21:28
|
|
| |
the difference is clear. leaders is generally a stupid idea and onyl barely improve some of youre troops while genreals or a better budget with military spending would improve all your troops but at a cost.. |
ancient
Chieftain
Rochester, N.Y. (worst place in the world)
May 2001
|
|
posted May 06, 2001 21:29
|
|
| |
i typo to often.. |
Youngsun
Prince
Darwin,NT,Australia
Jan 2000
|
 |
posted May 06, 2001 23:47
|
|
| |
Maybe you can have HQ unit that has no attack/defence pts but can be stacked with an army to increase its efficiency in terms of better communication,info. gathering, planning and execution.Military officers are mass produced from a military academy and they form the bulk of HQ personnel. To represent that , you just build a HQ unit and stack it to your army. sounds too simple? |
Lawrence of Arabia
Warlord
San Francisco, CA, USA
Apr 2001
|
|
posted May 07, 2001 21:01
|
|
| |
leaders, generals, they're the same things. Dont tell me that "Stonewall" Jackson and Patton arent generals.------------------
Its okay to smile; you're in America now |
ancient
Chieftain
Rochester, N.Y. (worst place in the world)
May 2001
|
|
posted May 08, 2001 16:01
|
|
| |
ok here it is..------------------
mean people suck
________________
official boycott list: dont post in their topics..
Lawrence of Arabia
email me @ nyorotono@lycos.com to add more names.. |
tniem
Prince
Grand Rapids
Apr 2000
|
|
posted May 08, 2001 16:14
|
|
| |
Ok, ancientI don't even know what your original proposal is because it has been edited by you so it would be nice for a repost or something so I know whats going on. Lawrence of Arabia is correct in saying that Patton and Jackson were generals. He also is correct in saying that Firaxis has said that you have a chance after each battle to become a major general. He went about it in a very harsh way. Not posting in each other's threads is not the way to go about in my opinion. I have had people here on ACS that have annoyed me. I have either ended up just ignoring them for a while or I simply don't let it bother me in any way. Boys will be boys. You are both fairly new here, why don't you just both take a deep breath, shake hands and acknowledge that you both have some Civ knowledge. And now can we please get back to discussing my favorite topic - Civ III ? |
ancient
Chieftain
Rochester, N.Y. (worst place in the world)
May 2001
|
|
posted May 08, 2001 21:02
|
|
| |
but if you have your own civ their wouldnt ever really be a patton or whatever which is why having a nameless general unit which works by army-general ratio would be the way to go in this situation.. |
Lawrence of Arabia
Warlord
San Francisco, CA, USA
Apr 2001
|
 |
posted May 08, 2001 22:52
|
|
| |
Ive been here for ages, I just didnt register until April.------------------
Its okay to smile; you're in America now |
Apolyton Civilization Site Forums
