Apolyton Archive  |  Preserved copy of the Apolyton Civilization Site forums as they ran on Ultimate Bulletin Board, 1998–2001. Read-only; nothing here can be posted to or replied to.  |  Forum index |  About this archive |  The 2005 site & forums

  Apolyton Civilization Site Forums
  Civ3-General/Suggestions
  Unites

Post New Topic  Post A ReplyPost A Reply In A New Window

profile | register | preferences | faq | search next newest topic | next oldest topic bottom of page
Author
Topic:   Unites Format for Better Printing
Lawrence of Arabia
Settler

Apr 2001
posted April 01, 2001 16:55   Click Here to See the Profile for Lawrence of ArabiaClick Here to Email Lawrence of Arabia  send a private message to Lawrence of Arabia
Edit/Delete Message    Reply To And Quote This Message
IP: Logged, Admin Access Only
Which civ I and civ2 units would you like to see come back for civ3. I would personally like to have the paratrooper and the helicopter.

------------------
Its okay to smile; you're in America now

Akron
Warlord
NJ
Mar 99
posted April 02, 2001 00:17   Click Here to See the Profile for AkronClick Here to Email Akron  send a private message to Akron
Edit/Delete Message    Reply To And Quote This Message
IP: Logged, Admin Access Only
I don't think there is a unit from a previous civ (non-ctp) that I don't want to see in civ 3. I really hope they add a lot more units as well and slow down the research pace so that it is possible to use the units more before they become obsolete. I always wanted more time to use the modern units too, as modern warefare is the most complex and interesting (hopefully medieval and ancient warefare will be more interesting in civ 3).
Lawrence of Arabia
Settler

Apr 2001
posted April 02, 2001 20:15   Click Here to See the Profile for Lawrence of ArabiaClick Here to Email Lawrence of Arabia  send a private message to Lawrence of Arabia
Edit/Delete Message    Reply To And Quote This Message
IP: Logged, Admin Access Only
The thing with civ2 though was that you didnt want to waste your resorces on building warriors when the next turn you'll get phalanxs. Another thing which happened was that there was a part of the game which you couldnt win when you attaacked. It was as soon as some1 invented conscription, the riflemen were unbeatle by the dragoons or cavalry. There was no artillery, only cannon, and if you attacked with a riflemen, you always lost. They have to fic it so that there is no such age like that, or if there is, then make it with turn of the 20th century tech.

------------------
Its okay to smile; you're in America now

Trachmir
Chieftain
Miami, Fl USA
Dec 2000
posted April 02, 2001 23:04   Click Here to See the Profile for Trachmir   send a private message to Trachmir
Edit/Delete Message    Reply To And Quote This Message
IP: Logged, Admin Access Only
One way to allow use of units, and not get caught in the mind set "I won't build phalanxes, 'cause soon I'll have pikemen', is to allow all civs to either upgrade or auto-upgrade units... I hate seeing charitots run around in the modern day!
Zanzin
Settler
Sydney, Australia
Mar 2001
posted April 02, 2001 23:09   Click Here to See the Profile for ZanzinClick Here to Email Zanzin  send a private message to Zanzin
Edit/Delete Message    Reply To And Quote This Message
IP: Logged, Admin Access Only
In Civ2, I always though, I'm not going to build an army until the modern age because otherwise I won't get to use it!! For some reason or another, CTP2 catpured ancient combat well - it was possible to raise an army of archers and hopolites and use them in campeign before they got out of date.
Lawrence of Arabia
Settler

Apr 2001
posted April 02, 2001 23:32   Click Here to See the Profile for Lawrence of ArabiaClick Here to Email Lawrence of Arabia  send a private message to Lawrence of Arabia
Edit/Delete Message    Reply To And Quote This Message
IP: Logged, Admin Access Only
The auto update can work something like this

Veteran pikemen, upgraded to muskateer lose there "veteran-ness"
Normal pikemen, upgraded to muskaterr lose some hit points

I think that Ctp2s way worked because of the possibility of stacking units. More "weak" units stacked together could still beat a few new ones.

------------------
Its okay to smile; you're in America now

Trachmir
Chieftain
Miami, Fl USA
Dec 2000
posted April 02, 2001 23:46   Click Here to See the Profile for Trachmir   send a private message to Trachmir
Edit/Delete Message    Reply To And Quote This Message
IP: Logged, Admin Access Only
I woundn't advocate the loss of veteran status... but I do like the idea of losing hit points after an "upgrade", thus you'll need a bit of time to "train" a unit back to "100%".
Apolyton Civilization Site Forums
> > > Civ3-General/Suggestions Forum

next newest topic | next oldest topictop of page

All times are EDT

Administrative Options: Close Topic | Archive/Move | Delete Topic | Top
Post New Topic  Post A ReplyPost A Reply In A New Window
Hop to:

Contact Us
Apolyton Civilization Site

Powered by: Ultimate Bulletin Board, Version 5.44a
© Infopop Corporation (formerly Madrona Park, Inc.), 1998 - 2000.

AltaVista Type or paste text or Web address (beginning with http://) here:
Powered
by Systran
Translate from: 

Front Page | Civilization III | Dinosaurs | Civilization II | Call to Power | Call to Power II | Alpha Centauri | Alternative Civs | Misc | Links | About ACS | GameStats
GameLeague | Scenario League | HAC | Civilization Scenario Collection | Spanish CivII Site | Clash of Civs | CtP Maps | Art of War | WesW's Ctp1/2 Site