Apolyton Archive  |  Preserved copy of the Apolyton Civilization Site forums as they ran on Ultimate Bulletin Board, 1998–2001. Read-only; nothing here can be posted to or replied to.  |  Forum index |  About this archive |  The 2005 site & forums

  Apolyton Civilization Site Forums
  Civ3-General/Suggestions
  Poll: City radius (Page 1)

Post New Topic  Post A ReplyPost A Reply In A New Window

This topic is 2 pages long:   1  2  profile | register | preferences | faq | search next newest topic | next oldest topic bottom of page
Author
Topic:   Poll: City radius Format for Better Printing
Tiberius
Warlord
& Tradelord
Jan 2000
posted February 14, 2001 02:12   Click Here to See the Profile for TiberiusClick Here to Email Tiberius  send a private message to Tiberius
Edit/Delete Message    Reply To And Quote This Message
IP: Logged, Admin Access Only
Do you want to see expanding city radius in Civ3?

1. Yes, I love it! Give me expanding, huge cities with 4 or 5 circles radius!

2. I like it, but don't let cities grow beyond 3 circles radius.

3. I like the idea of expanding city radius, but 2 circles radius (Civ2) is enough.

4. No! I like the Civ2 style fixed city radius (2 circles).

5. I don't know / I don't care.

Note: city radius = the circles around a city, without the city itself

Vote
[This message has been edited by Tiberius (edited February 15, 2001).]
[This message has been edited by Tiberius (edited February 15, 2001).]
[This message has been edited by Tiberius (edited February 16, 2001).]

Tiberius
Warlord
& Tradelord
Jan 2000
posted February 14, 2001 02:49   Click Here to See the Profile for TiberiusClick Here to Email Tiberius  send a private message to Tiberius
Edit/Delete Message    Reply To And Quote This Message
IP: Logged, Admin Access Only
OK, my vote goes for 2: expanding city radius, but no more than 3 circles.

In the same time, I'd like to see benefits for big cities, like trade/tourism/production/science bonuses, but some negative effects too: overcrowding, crime, deseases, etc.

The point is, well managed big cities should become important region centers, not "only" cities.

Grumbold
Warlord
London, UK
Mar 2000
posted February 14, 2001 06:22   Click Here to See the Profile for Grumbold   send a private message to Grumbold
Edit/Delete Message    Reply To And Quote This Message
IP: Logged, Admin Access Only
2. But expanding only from 1 to 2 square radius.

I already believe the civ "cities" are just approximate representations of the regional population and infrastructure. The one big city could in fact be two, three or even more urban centres.

bagdar
Warlord
Turkey
Jan 2001
posted February 14, 2001 07:17   Click Here to See the Profile for bagdar   send a private message to bagdar
Edit/Delete Message    Reply To And Quote This Message
IP: Logged, Admin Access Only
2

and please a solution for large cities shrinking and growing again at the later stages of the game.

Henrik
Prince
of the Angaracks
Dec 2000
posted February 14, 2001 08:36   Click Here to See the Profile for HenrikClick Here to Email Henrik  send a private message to Henrik
Edit/Delete Message    Reply To And Quote This Message
IP: Logged, Admin Access Only
A mix of 1 and 2. the max would be four circles (one more than in civ2). But only for extremly big cities.
[This message has been edited by Henrik (edited February 14, 2001).]
jglidewell
Settler
manassas va usa
Feb 2001
posted February 14, 2001 09:33   Click Here to See the Profile for jglidewell   send a private message to jglidewell
Edit/Delete Message    Reply To And Quote This Message
IP: Logged, Admin Access Only
1. yes yes yes

This is crucial as to when I buy the Game. If the Map is dynamic then I will buy right at release 48$ but if not will wait a year and buy at the discount 9-18$

The Regiaonal ides put forth thus far should be included.

Nikolai
Warlord
Bergen, Norway, Hordaland
Oct 2000
posted February 14, 2001 11:29   Click Here to See the Profile for NikolaiClick Here to Email Nikolai  send a private message to Nikolai
Edit/Delete Message    Reply To And Quote This Message
IP: Logged, Admin Access Only
4. I like the one as it is today, but I haven't tried the CTP2 one. therefor I don't want to hold one over another.

------------------
Who am I? What am I? Do we need Civ? Well....

wittlich
Warlord
Fayetteville, NC, USA
Dec 2000
posted February 14, 2001 11:34   Click Here to See the Profile for wittlichClick Here to Email wittlich  send a private message to wittlichSend a Message to UIN: 110689330
Edit/Delete Message    Reply To And Quote This Message
IP: Logged, Admin Access Only
I have to place my ballot for #2. I like expanding city radii, as long as it doesn't get carried away
Trachmir
Chieftain
Miami, Fl USA
Dec 2000
posted February 14, 2001 18:22   Click Here to See the Profile for Trachmir   send a private message to Trachmir
Edit/Delete Message    Reply To And Quote This Message
IP: Logged, Admin Access Only
Actually I want the cities to expand from 1 tile to 2, 3, 4, etc. And as the actual city expands, the radius would also increase... but I think the radius should only be one square.
monolith94
Emperor
Apolyton Lith of Wisdom
b.02-15-99
posted February 14, 2001 21:43   Click Here to See the Profile for monolith94Click Here to Email monolith94  send a private message to monolith94Send a Message to UIN: 32590923 Visit monolith94's Homepage!
Edit/Delete Message    Reply To And Quote This Message
IP: Logged, Admin Access Only
A reaching area of four or five would be absolutely ridiculous, not to mention ludicrous. Instead of having Paris, or Lyons, you would only have one city, France!

I say the max should be set at a radius of 2, at absolute MAX. Growing from 1 to 2 is fine with me though, though I may learn to eat those words.

AzNtoccata
Chieftain

Jan 2001
posted February 14, 2001 23:24   Click Here to See the Profile for AzNtoccataClick Here to Email AzNtoccata  send a private message to AzNtoccata
Edit/Delete Message    Reply To And Quote This Message
IP: Logged, Admin Access Only
I got an idea, how about increasing radius as population increase? of course there is a limit...
Tiberius
Warlord
& Tradelord
Jan 2000
posted February 15, 2001 01:28   Click Here to See the Profile for TiberiusClick Here to Email Tiberius  send a private message to Tiberius
Edit/Delete Message    Reply To And Quote This Message
IP: Logged, Admin Access Only
I added a new nr. 3, so I will count your votes according to the new numbering.

Results so far:

Choice.....Votes
1.............1
2.............4
3.............2
4.............0
5.............1

Henrik: cities in Civ2 have 2 circles radius. (without the city itself, of course; sorry if I didn't mention that)
Trachmir: think about how big is actually a map tile in Civ2, if you make the right scaling ...
AzNtoccata: What do you mean? The city radius is supposed to grow when the population reaches a certain limit (for ex: city size 1-8: 1 circle, 9-16: 2 circles, 17-24: 3 circles, etc)
[This message has been edited by Tiberius (edited February 15, 2001).]

ContradictioN
Prince
chch, New Zealand
Nov 1999
posted February 15, 2001 03:03   Click Here to See the Profile for ContradictioN   send a private message to ContradictioN
Edit/Delete Message    Reply To And Quote This Message
IP: Logged, Admin Access Only
1 of course, thats the way it is.

What? are you pussies too scared to tackle real life problems?

Stuff2
Warlord

Sep 1999
posted February 15, 2001 05:04   Click Here to See the Profile for Stuff2   send a private message to Stuff2
Edit/Delete Message    Reply To And Quote This Message
IP: Logged, Admin Access Only
I vote for number 4
Adm.Naismith
Prince
Milano - Italy
Oct 1999
posted February 15, 2001 05:40   Click Here to See the Profile for Adm.Naismith   send a private message to Adm.Naismith Visit Adm.Naismith's Homepage!
Edit/Delete Message    Reply To And Quote This Message
IP: Logged, Admin Access Only
I know CTP2 players complained about city radius problems, but I don't know why (someone can give me a hint?) and I searched in CTP2 forum without a succesful result.

So far, I vote for 2) Expanding, but don't let cities grow beyond 3 circles radius (starting with a radius of 1).

I would like to consider City radius not exactly a circle: I mean, if a city is near unpassable mountains it must limit the radius in that direction, as 1 square limit in sea shore direction (large fishing far from coast is unrealistic until proper tech advance, i.e. port facility).

I don't think this should be balanced from a radius stretch into "permitted" directions, i.e. having coastal city area growing more square following the coast line, but I'm open to different opinion.

It's more complex than usual circle method, but it could be more interesting, at least if some kind of CTP2 "public works" will be implemented.

Of course the player should have some "point cursor here to show city usable area" function, to check before moving a settler to found a new city.

------------------
Admiral Naismith AKA mcostant

Grumbold
Warlord
London, UK
Mar 2000
posted February 15, 2001 06:49   Click Here to See the Profile for Grumbold   send a private message to Grumbold
Edit/Delete Message    Reply To And Quote This Message
IP: Logged, Admin Access Only
The CtP problems with expanding city radius are varied. Its difficult to distinguish it from the many balance problems the game has. A radius 2 city can easily support all the buildings so many radius 2 cities are better than a quarter the number of radius 4 ones, particularly at the start of the game. Because CtP2 does not allocate workers to tiles, the rollover points when the radius expands can actually see a fall in worker productivity because the effort is distributed evenly over less beneficial and less improved tiles. The government-set limit on cities is the biggest incentive to build further apart but that is offset by the poor defensibility (when not playing against the timid AI.)
Tiberius
Warlord
& Tradelord
Jan 2000
posted February 15, 2001 07:33   Click Here to See the Profile for TiberiusClick Here to Email Tiberius  send a private message to Tiberius
Edit/Delete Message    Reply To And Quote This Message
IP: Logged, Admin Access Only
Interesting idea, Adm.Naismith.

Let's see how many possibilities do we have:
1. far sea tiles - port facility
2. tiles behind high mountains - road/railroad ?
3. tiles on the other side of rivers - bridge building
4.... something else ?

Anyway, since you voted nr.2, the problem with far tiles could start only with the second circle, which means (probably) 8 size cities.

The Viceroy
Warlord
London, Great Britain
Nov 2000
posted February 15, 2001 10:36   Click Here to See the Profile for The ViceroyClick Here to Email The Viceroy  send a private message to The Viceroy
Edit/Delete Message    Reply To And Quote This Message
IP: Logged, Admin Access Only
#1 gets my vote.

Although it would be nice to have it optional for scenario's.

airdrik
Warlord
Boise, ID, USA
Oct 2000
posted February 15, 2001 12:16   Click Here to See the Profile for airdrikClick Here to Email airdrik  send a private message to airdrik
Edit/Delete Message    Reply To And Quote This Message
IP: Logged, Admin Access Only
My vote goes to 2), but like Adm.Naismith said, I want the city radii to be dynamic ie. you start with the tile the city starts on, and one adjacent tile, then you/the computer picks between one of the adjacent tiles to those tiles you started on each time your city grows. then you could have city radii that look like this:
wwwww
w...w
w..wwwww
.....cw
.....wwwww
or
wwwwww
.....www
......cwww...ww
........w.....w
....wwwwwwwwwwww
rather than
.www
wwwww
wwcww
wwwww
.www

[This message has been edited by airdrik (edited February 15, 2001).]
wittlich
Warlord
Fayetteville, NC, USA
Dec 2000
posted February 15, 2001 12:46   Click Here to See the Profile for wittlichClick Here to Email wittlich  send a private message to wittlichSend a Message to UIN: 110689330
Edit/Delete Message    Reply To And Quote This Message
IP: Logged, Admin Access Only
quote:

Originally posted by airdrik on 02-15-2001 12:16 PM
My vote goes to 2), but like Adm.Naismith said, I want the city radii to be dynamic ie. you start with the tile the city starts on, and one adjacent tile, then you/the computer picks between one of the adjacent tiles to those tiles you started on each time your city grows. then you could have city radii that look like this:
wwwww
w...w
w..wwwww
.....cw
.....wwwww
or
wwwwww
.....www
......cwww...ww
........w.....w
....wwwwwwwwwwww
rather than
.www
wwwww
wwcww
wwwww
.www

[This message has been edited by airdrik (edited February 15, 2001).]

Intersting idea Airdrik. I think I see what you are getting at - with your suggestion a player would be able to control/mold how his city expands. I like it!

Sabre2th
Chieftain
Ballston Spa, NY, USA
Nov 2000
posted February 15, 2001 22:42   Click Here to See the Profile for Sabre2th   send a private message to Sabre2th
Edit/Delete Message    Reply To And Quote This Message
IP: Logged, Admin Access Only
I vote for #2. I liked the expanding radius idea, but Activision went too far.
Anunikoba
Prince
Michigan,USA
Sep 1999
posted February 16, 2001 01:44   Click Here to See the Profile for Anunikoba   send a private message to Anunikoba
Edit/Delete Message    Reply To And Quote This Message
IP: Logged, Admin Access Only
I like the idea, but when Activision implemented it into CTP2, it didn't work well. This is due to the fact that you can't assign a city's workers in CTP2, which means you get locked in to which squares are worked by which cities. But if you can pick and choose which bases work which sqaures, the expanding system might be worth while.

Tiberius
Warlord
& Tradelord
Jan 2000
posted February 16, 2001 01:45   Click Here to See the Profile for TiberiusClick Here to Email Tiberius  send a private message to Tiberius
Edit/Delete Message    Reply To And Quote This Message
IP: Logged, Admin Access Only

Results so far:

Choice......Votes
1..............3
2..............7
3..............2
4..............1
5..............1

Trachmir
Chieftain
Miami, Fl USA
Dec 2000
posted February 16, 2001 18:31   Click Here to See the Profile for Trachmir   send a private message to Trachmir
Edit/Delete Message    Reply To And Quote This Message
IP: Logged, Admin Access Only
I guess my vote goes to #3 then... but I think the cities should grow... for example I live in Miami, if you count Miami/Ft. Lauderdale/Homestead/West Palm Beach all as one city (which in civ terms you could), they do indeed expand the urban centers over hundreds of miles.
Jonny
Chieftain
Kingston Springs, Tennessee, USA
Nov 2000
posted February 16, 2001 23:33   Click Here to See the Profile for JonnyClick Here to Email Jonny  send a private message to Jonny Visit Jonny's Homepage!
Edit/Delete Message    Reply To And Quote This Message
IP: Logged, Admin Access Only
I vote for 2. I liked the idea in CTP2, but Activision didn't implement it very well. Also, please let us choose where our workers go!

Jonny
[This message has been edited by Jonny (edited February 16, 2001).]

Youngsun
Prince
Darwin,NT,Australia
Jan 2000
posted February 17, 2001 01:49   Click Here to See the Profile for YoungsunClick Here to Email Youngsun  send a private message to Youngsun
Edit/Delete Message    Reply To And Quote This Message
IP: Logged, Admin Access Only
I recall someone mentioned 9 squres(Colonisation)with distant workcamps(Imperialism)and that sounds very interesting.

.......w.
.........
.w.......
...www...
...wcw...
...www...
.........
w......w.

work camps can be connected to the city by railways or road.

I'm also interested in Admiral's idea too.
Bravo Admiral!
[This message has been edited by Youngsun (edited February 17, 2001).]

Ralf
Prince
Sweden
Mar 2000
posted February 17, 2001 04:09   Click Here to See the Profile for Ralf   send a private message to Ralf
Edit/Delete Message    Reply To And Quote This Message
IP: Logged, Admin Access Only
Firaxis has mentioned that they already playes around with a very early & premature beta-version of the game. If so; any such elementary game core-element as for example what city-radius model they should apply, has most probably already been decided, designed and irreversibly implemented.

So any present & future polls dealing with core-elements of Civ-3 is basically a waste of time.
At this stage; polls should instead be about minor addon features, or minor tweaks & changes in the game.

About my viewpoints on the city-area issue; well, Im all in for building on what we already got in Civ-2: Enhancements based on the good old fixed 21-square city-area model, together with that ingenious clickable city-area view. Check out The pitfalls of expanding city-areas in Civ-3 to find out more why any type of expanding city-areas is alltogether bad and weak ideas.

[This message has been edited by Ralf (edited February 17, 2001).]

Roman
Prince
Bratislava, Slovakia
Sep 2000
posted February 17, 2001 08:09   Click Here to See the Profile for RomanClick Here to Email Roman  send a private message to RomanSend a Message to UIN: 91325836
Edit/Delete Message    Reply To And Quote This Message
IP: Logged, Admin Access Only
I think the Civ2 system of city management worked just fine, so I vote to keep it.
Stuff2
Warlord

Sep 1999
posted February 17, 2001 13:46   Click Here to See the Profile for Stuff2   send a private message to Stuff2
Edit/Delete Message    Reply To And Quote This Message
IP: Logged, Admin Access Only
I've posted a different idea on this subject. The post is called "Satellite cities". Yes i know it's a silly name but it's actually about this topic.
Roman
Prince
Bratislava, Slovakia
Sep 2000
posted February 17, 2001 13:48   Click Here to See the Profile for RomanClick Here to Email Roman  send a private message to RomanSend a Message to UIN: 91325836
Edit/Delete Message    Reply To And Quote This Message
IP: Logged, Admin Access Only
quote:

Originally posted by Stuff2 on 02-17-2001 01:46 PM
I've posted a different idea on this subject. The post is called "Satellite cities". Yes i know it's a silly name but it's actually about this topic.

I have seen that thread and I love the idea.

Henrik
Prince
of the Angaracks
Dec 2000
posted February 17, 2001 15:17   Click Here to See the Profile for HenrikClick Here to Email Henrik  send a private message to Henrik
Edit/Delete Message    Reply To And Quote This Message
IP: Logged, Admin Access Only
quote:

Originally posted by Ralf on 02-17-2001 04:09 AM
Firaxis has mentioned that they already playes around with a very early & premature beta-version of the game. If so; any such elementary game core-element as for example what city-radius model they should apply, has most probably already been decided, designed and irreversibly implemented.

So any present & future polls dealing with core-elements of Civ-3 is basically a waste of time.
At this stage; polls should instead be about minor addon features, or minor tweaks & changes in the game.


Well, in colonization they changed the city radius the same week as they released the game, why wouldn't they be able to change it now?

Socialist Dictator
Settler
Holland
Dec 2000
posted February 17, 2001 16:16   Click Here to See the Profile for Socialist Dictator   send a private message to Socialist Dictator
Edit/Delete Message    Reply To And Quote This Message
IP: Logged, Admin Access Only
One more vote for number 3.
Chuckles
Prince
Burnaby, BC, Canada
b.02-15-99
posted February 17, 2001 17:51   Click Here to See the Profile for ChucklesClick Here to Email Chuckles  send a private message to Chuckles
Edit/Delete Message    Reply To And Quote This Message
IP: Logged, Admin Access Only
I like the idea of 3 as well. Perhaps I've just been trained this way since civ1 but I like it. I don't want cities getting out of hand.
Adm.Naismith
Prince
Milano - Italy
Oct 1999
posted February 17, 2001 19:54   Click Here to See the Profile for Adm.Naismith   send a private message to Adm.Naismith Visit Adm.Naismith's Homepage!
Edit/Delete Message    Reply To And Quote This Message
IP: Logged, Admin Access Only
quote:


Firaxis has mentioned that they already playes around with a very early & premature beta-version of the game. If so; any such elementary game core-element as for example what city-radius model they should apply, has most probably already been decided, designed and irreversibly implemented.

Ralf, you may be right, but Firaxis told the very same about early beta developed for Dino, and now we had discovered Dino never taked off!
At that stage they haven't decided yet if the game had to be First person, TBS, RTS!

So I'm not taking anything for sure until Firaxis tell us in bold letter, therefore I suppose we can chat about almost everything

Ehi, I'm not sure only Firaxis team is reading the forum: you can never be sure where do "The Next Big Game" will come from!

------------------
Admiral Naismith AKA mcostant

Tiberius
Warlord
& Tradelord
Jan 2000
posted February 20, 2001 01:02   Click Here to See the Profile for TiberiusClick Here to Email Tiberius  send a private message to Tiberius
Edit/Delete Message    Reply To And Quote This Message
IP: Logged, Admin Access Only
Results so far:

Choice.....................................................Votes
1.expanding, more than 3 circles radius.........3
2.expanding, max. 3 circles radius.................8
3.expanding, max. 2 circles radius.................5
4.fixed style city radius, with 2 circles............3
5.I don't know/I don't care............................1

Note: Ralf, I counted your vote as 4
[This message has been edited by Tiberius (edited February 20, 2001).]
[This message has been edited by Tiberius (edited February 20, 2001).]

yin26
King
Work in Seoul, Korea. From Los Angeles.
Apr 99
posted February 20, 2001 02:20   Click Here to See the Profile for yin26Click Here to Email yin26  send a private message to yin26
Edit/Delete Message    Reply To And Quote This Message
IP: Logged, Admin Access Only
Hmmm, not sure.

Just because you build a city doesn't exactly mean that its people are doing anything with the area all around it, right? So I think a city's radius should directly reflect the development you designate...no limit except for the fact that the further the tile from the city, the greater the efficiency penalty.

So while I could technically have a city radius of 10 circles, it would hardly be worthwhile to do so, pushing me then to either make more cities (which I hope we fix with anti-ICS stuff anyway) or by making my current tiles much more efficient (which is really what I hope will have to happen).

You choose which category that puts me in...1, I guess.

Tiberius
Warlord
& Tradelord
Jan 2000
posted February 20, 2001 05:09   Click Here to See the Profile for TiberiusClick Here to Email Tiberius  send a private message to Tiberius
Edit/Delete Message    Reply To And Quote This Message
IP: Logged, Admin Access Only
Interesting idea Yin, to allow unlimited number of radius circles and link the efficiency of tiles to the distance from the city.
What I don't understand is how can you control the city and the radius size ? I mean, if the radius grows automatically with every k citizen "head", how can you stop your city to grow beyond n circles radius? Through efficiency? For ex: in the 5th circle the efficiency will be so low, that the city coudn't gather enough food to grow?
I guess certain discoveries will raise your farm's efficiency level, allowing further growing.

Not bad. I'll count your vote as 1, anyway

Gastrifitis
Settler
Waterloo, IA, US
Feb 2001
posted February 21, 2001 16:46   Click Here to See the Profile for Gastrifitis   send a private message to Gastrifitis
Edit/Delete Message    Reply To And Quote This Message
IP: Logged, Admin Access Only
I like the cities normally having a fixed radius, but I think there should be a Wonder of the World which allows a specific city to have an expanded radius. That would keep things from getting too out of hand.
Boracks
Settler
Surrey, BC, Canada
Jan 2001
posted February 21, 2001 18:00   Click Here to See the Profile for BoracksClick Here to Email Boracks  send a private message to Boracks
Edit/Delete Message    Reply To And Quote This Message
IP: Logged, Admin Access Only
2. I'd like to see cities grow, shucks, I'd like to see smaller cities merge into bigger entities (like Toronto).

------------------
"Treat each day as if it were your last. Eventually, you'll be right."

cyclotron7
Warlord
California
Jan 2001
posted February 21, 2001 18:23   Click Here to See the Profile for cyclotron7Click Here to Email cyclotron7  send a private message to cyclotron7
Edit/Delete Message    Reply To And Quote This Message
IP: Logged, Admin Access Only
quote:

Originally posted by Gastrifitis on 02-21-2001 04:46 PM
I like the cities normally having a fixed radius, but I think there should be a Wonder of the World which allows a specific city to have an expanded radius. That would keep things from getting too out of hand.

Or an improvement, like mass transit, subways, or streetcars. Just as aqueducts and sewers increase maximum population, there would be improvements to increase maximum city size. Improved local transportation was the major force in creating the large, sprawling cities of today and inventing suburbia.

------------------
"Any shred of compassion left in me was snuffed out forever when they cast me into the flames..."
- Marsil, called the Pretender

Apolyton Civilization Site Forums
> > > Civ3-General/Suggestions Forum

This topic is 2 pages long:   1  2 
next newest topic | next oldest topictop of page

All times are EDT

Administrative Options: Close Topic | Archive/Move | Delete Topic | Top
Post New Topic  Post A ReplyPost A Reply In A New Window
Hop to:

Contact Us
Apolyton Civilization Site

Powered by: Ultimate Bulletin Board, Version 5.44a
© Infopop Corporation (formerly Madrona Park, Inc.), 1998 - 2000.

AltaVista Type or paste text or Web address (beginning with http://) here:
Powered
by Systran
Translate from: 

Front Page | Civilization III | Dinosaurs | Civilization II | Call to Power | Call to Power II | Alpha Centauri | Alternative Civs | Misc | Links | About ACS | GameStats
GameLeague | Scenario League | HAC | Civilization Scenario Collection | Spanish CivII Site | Clash of Civs | CtP Maps | Art of War | WesW's Ctp1/2 Site