|
Author
|
|
Topic: Opinion on Space feature for Civ 3 |  |
|
David James Prince Kingston, Province of Ontario, Dominion of Canada b.02-15-99
|
 |
posted February 10, 2001 13:11
  |
 |
 |  |
There seems to be pretty widespread agreement that space cities a la CtP is a bad idea (I just bought the game and haven't got that far along yet) and already I can see why - just looking at the tech tree and units chart, etc.I'm with Theben on this one - the game could end with a successful manned space flight to Mars. To be able to launch such a project would require a few space improvements such as shuttles and an orbital production facility (or rather facilities) and perhaps a space station (maybe limit one per civ, ie like the palace/capitol) that would serve to actually assemble and launch the ship - so it would be like having just one "city" in space. Of course the station would have to be built using the orbital platforms (and shuttled parts) whilst the platforms would be built from shuttled up parts (or other existing platforms). This seems realistic enough whilst also being a significant, game-ending endeavour, with all the features of a space race. I'd axe the possibility of space warfare though (other than spy satellites) so the only way to win is to get to Mars first or to conquer the other civ on the ground. Finally, this has the advantage of limiting future techs to a few realistic near-future techs. What do you think? ------------------ Yes, as a matter of fact, going to Queen's does make me better than you. |
bagdar Chieftain Turkey Jan 2001
|
 |
posted February 10, 2001 13:25
|
 |
 |  |
Mars is certainly more reasonable, but let's not forget that the odyssey to Alpha Centauri is an integral part of the CIV experience. Let's reserve that much fantasy to the game. To conclude: NO Future Techs. Keep it as it is! |
Biddles Prince Melbourne, Victoria, Australia Mar 99
|
 |
posted February 10, 2001 21:57
  |
 |
 |  |
You can't have no future tech's and a manned mission to alpha centauri. The thing is as long as the neccesary future techs are reasonable and not into the sci-fi realm, this hould be okay. |
David James Prince Kingston, Province of Ontario, Dominion of Canada b.02-15-99
|
 |
posted February 10, 2001 22:17
  |
 |
 |  |
Maybe I should clarify a bit... by 'future techs' I meant futuristic techs like cryonics, alien archeology and cloaking in CtP, not the out and out 'future techs' of Civ2, though they'd be gone as well I guess. Frankly, I can't see how there's enough technological depth in Civ2 to be able to justify building a spaceship capable of interstellar travel, albeit at high sublight. I mean come on - according to the tech tree we could get to Alpha Centauri right now! I can accept getting to Mars with more or less current tech and within the confines of the Civ2 tech tree, but not to Alpha Centauri. Let's be realistic and keep it to the present and plausible near-future: let's make the endgame a race to Mars. | |