|
Author
|
|
Topic: Spaces |  |
|
Jer8m8
Chieftain
New York, America
Nov 2000
|
 |
posted January 26, 2001 11:50
   | 
 |
 |  |
do we need real spaces on the map. What if you give each unit a "range" they can move, a circle around the m cut short by mountains, swamps, etc. But, there would be squares underneath, to provide an exact location for a city. Units should be free to move where they want!Any Comments? |
EnochF
Prince
Seattle, WA
b.02-15-99
|
 |
posted January 26, 2001 16:19
|
|
| |
 |
wittlich
Warlord
Fayetteville, NC, USA
Dec 2000
|
|
posted January 26, 2001 19:35
|
|
| |
I think I understand what you mean and sorry, but I don't agree. Certain units whould be limited. If we have units moving anywhere they want, then we might as well not have terrain. |
ajli@home
Chieftain
Los Angeles, California, United States
Aug 2000
|
|
posted January 26, 2001 23:45
 |
|
| |
I know what you are talking about.If you go to interplay.com and search for an old game called "conquest of the new world", you can buy it for 9-18 bucks. It makes a really cool "RTS-TBS" game that is what I think Jer8mr8 is talking about. It would be really cool and realistic...but would probably be very hard to make, considering how complex civ3 will probably be. |
The Patriot
Settler
Greatest Place on Earth
Jan 2001
|
|
posted January 27, 2001 22:51
|
|
| |
I commented...now I am leaving.  THis is a mixed idea in my head. It is really confusing. On one hand, I dont understand it at all...but I do want to like the idea. On the other hand, I dont understand it at all...and I am praying I hate the idea. |
Apolyton Civilization Site Forums
