Apolyton Archive  |  Preserved copy of the Apolyton Civilization Site forums as they ran on Ultimate Bulletin Board, 1998–2001. Read-only; nothing here can be posted to or replied to.  |  Forum index |  About this archive |  The 2005 site & forums

  Apolyton Civilization Site Forums
  Civ3-General/Suggestions
  Unification

Post New Topic  Post A ReplyPost A Reply In A New Window

profile | register | preferences | faq | search next newest topic | next oldest topic bottom of page
Author
Topic:   Unification Format for Better Printing
New Yorker
Chieftain
New York, New York
Jan 2001
posted January 13, 2001 18:07   Click Here to See the Profile for New Yorker   send a private message to New Yorker
Edit/Delete Message    Reply To And Quote This Message
IP: Logged, Admin Access Only
here is an idea 4 all u peace-loving hippies 4 expanding ur empires

'unification' is my idea of diplomatic/peaceful way of gettin' larger when there is no where to go & no wars must be fought

there r 2 types i could think of:

Merger-ur civ unites w/ a major civ, there must be a long established alliance & trust between u & the other civ in order 4 this work. u contact the civ & propose a merger between ur 2 nations, if accepted ur 2 civs become 1 & a random name(or if u want to name the new civ, u could). u get right away half of the minor cities under ur control, while another 1/4 of the cities u can only produce stuff not directly control taxes & science, these cities' $ & science output go to the AI u just merged with. the remaining cities r under the AI's control

the AI is still active but its military before the merger is under ur control & any military built after the merger is under the AI's control, science & money outputs from half of its cities go to the AI as well & it can discover new techs which r automaticly urs & vice versa

Since there r 2 governing parties, domestic & foriegn affairs will be handed in mini-planetry council style, if they nay ur cuzs u can push aside their nays & what u please but this could add on to a chance 4 a massive revolution

other time u gain more control over these cities own by the AI & the AI become less important 2 a point u got complete control

Annex-u just sign a membership treaty w/ a minor civ. no alliances or treaties r needed but it would help otherwise u must threaten them or put heavy pressure on them like heavy military forces within their borders

of course 'unification' shouldn't go without approval, since its a good idea 4 AI to do the same, but they might not be so smart to do it anyway, if AIs can unite into 1 civ than there might be conflict between 2 civs over annexing a minor civ & 4 'unification' of 2 major civs, i got a idea 4 that 2

a congress of all the major civs, who vote if it goes through, naturally the 2 uniting civs can't vote but they turn some of the other civs towards their favor.
if it passes under the international community its a good start 4 the new nation, than again a civ might have a problem with this & can cuz problems 4 the new nation. of course, if the international community doesn't agree, the 2 civs can continue in unification but it would make the international community piss off & this can get ugly, like a world war ugly

the main rules 4 approval of mergers r the nation involved warlike or peaceful, how trusting & the power created is it 2 big or just fine, remember everyone must do what they got to do to live

this is a damn big suggest & i need feedbacks on how much it sucks, how it rocks or how much improvements must be made-cuz i know it is damn complex but if added it could make things interesting, that is if the AIs can be smart and merge
[This message has been edited by New Yorker (edited January 13, 2001).]

JosefGiven
Warlord
Okehampton,Devon,UK
Jan 2001
posted January 14, 2001 11:19   Click Here to See the Profile for JosefGiven   send a private message to JosefGivenSend a Message to UIN: 108428777 Visit JosefGiven's Homepage!
Edit/Delete Message    Reply To And Quote This Message
IP: Logged, Admin Access Only
New Yorker,

Clearly, you are an intelligent chap. In your posts, I can see the glimmers of some very good ideas. But, and I have to say it - I find it nearly impossible to understand what you are talking about. All the abbreviations and colloquialisms you use make reading your posts very difficult.

Please re-read them, and understand what it must be like for someone else!!

No offence!

------------------
Josef Given
josefgiven@hotmail.com

Brent
Chieftain

Dec 2000
posted January 14, 2001 15:56   Click Here to See the Profile for BrentClick Here to Email Brent  send a private message to Brent
Edit/Delete Message    Reply To And Quote This Message
IP: Logged, Admin Access Only
Maybe a diplomatic victory would involve detailed negotiations to unify the world.
Admiral PJ
Settler
Southeast England , UK
Dec 2000
posted April 24, 2001 18:41   Click Here to See the Profile for Admiral PJ   send a private message to Admiral PJ
Edit/Delete Message    Reply To And Quote This Message
IP: Logged, Admin Access Only
Interesting,
its all possible more or less, though like in the game i'm making,
the ordiary population of a country can have a say in wether they unify or breakaway.

I think your idea about a Planetary organistaion (NATO/UN etc) is good too.. I suppose the main world power could set its agenda (like the US tends to), or it could be democratic where even a small country can muck up world events(haha) SMACS system was intersting, the bigger your countries population the more say you had in Planetary votes.

Hmm so your thinking there could be lots of Organisations like the UN, Warsaw Pact etc,
my game has various Organisations -businesses etc, and you can have Summits to achieve this, diplomacy with multiple leaders..
(copyrighted to VIRE Tech.. me :P )

You could have a whole cold war scenario, with Russia and America fighting over a country to get it to join one or other side.

Its tricky having these minor dependancies sharing your production, maybe you can just donate money to them, most games just make these nations effectively another of your cities- all of them can build what you want,
but i'm thinking of having these minor countries be independenant, and you as their mother country tell them
'build an invasion force' or 'work towards scientific research in the area of Physics/weapons/economy' etc
which could affect the actual workings of their AI.

for more info email me at
peter@artpac.demon.co.uk

Admiral PJT
Emperor of the second galactic Potatoe

Apolyton Civilization Site Forums
> > > Civ3-General/Suggestions Forum

next newest topic | next oldest topictop of page

All times are EDT

Administrative Options: Close Topic | Archive/Move | Delete Topic | Top
Post New Topic  Post A ReplyPost A Reply In A New Window
Hop to:

Contact Us
Apolyton Civilization Site

Powered by: Ultimate Bulletin Board, Version 5.44a
© Infopop Corporation (formerly Madrona Park, Inc.), 1998 - 2000.

AltaVista Type or paste text or Web address (beginning with http://) here:
Powered
by Systran
Translate from: 

Front Page | Civilization III | Dinosaurs | Civilization II | Call to Power | Call to Power II | Alpha Centauri | Alternative Civs | Misc | Links | About ACS | GameStats
GameLeague | Scenario League | HAC | Civilization Scenario Collection | Spanish CivII Site | Clash of Civs | CtP Maps | Art of War | WesW's Ctp1/2 Site