Apolyton Archive  |  Preserved copy of the Apolyton Civilization Site forums as they ran on Ultimate Bulletin Board, 1998–2001. Read-only; nothing here can be posted to or replied to.  |  Forum index |  About this archive |  The 2005 site & forums

  Apolyton Civilization Site Forums
  Civ3-General/Suggestions
  Let the nitpicking begin! (and rambling)

Post New Topic  Post A ReplyPost A Reply In A New Window

profile | register | preferences | faq | search next newest topic | next oldest topic bottom of page
Author
Topic:   Let the nitpicking begin! (and rambling) Format for Better Printing
vbthequiet
Settler

Jul 1999
posted January 08, 2001 19:06   Click Here to See the Profile for vbthequietClick Here to Email vbthequiet  send a private message to vbthequiet
Edit/Delete Message    Reply To And Quote This Message
IP: Logged, Admin Access Only
Having visited the Firaxis CIV3, i feel compelled to begin commenting.
First off, I doubt this will affect the game in any signifcant fashion: Why do they have a F-15 and a MIG-29? The MIG-29 shares much in common with the F-15. I can give a short history, but i'll be simple. They're both fighters from the same general era, and have the same general preformance and function. (1970's-80's, Mach 2+, Air Superiority) It doesn't make much sense. Are these two seperate units? Or two different animations for the same unit used to give civilizations some visual difference? (Supersonic Fighter Aircraft Unit, or something along those lines)

I nearly forgot about the nitpicking part. Does anyone else think the Abhrams tank doesn't look angular enough and the F15 to stubby?

Its late for suggestions, but I think they'd be better off using general names rather than Panzer, F15, MIG29,or Abhrams.

tniem
Warlord
Grand Rapids
Apr 2000
posted January 08, 2001 23:10   Click Here to See the Profile for tniemClick Here to Email tniem  send a private message to tniem Visit tniem's Homepage!
Edit/Delete Message    Reply To And Quote This Message
IP: Logged, Admin Access Only
O.K. plenty of talk that the MiG-29 and the F-15 are the same plane. I looked for some information. Here is what I found from Britannica.com:

quote:

The MiG-29, first operational in 1985, is a single-seat, twin-engine air-to-air fighter that can also be used for ground attack.

F-15

quote:

also called EAGLE, twin-engine jet fighter produced by the McDonnell Douglas Corporation of the United States. Based on a design proposed in 1969 for an air-superiority fighter, it has also been built in fighter-bomber versions. F-15s were delivered to the U.S. Air Force between 1974 and 1994; they have also been sold to U.S. allies in the Middle East and have been assembled under contract in Japan.

The F-15 has a wingspan of 42 feet 9.75 inches (13.05 m) and a length of 63 feet 9 inches (19.43 m). It is powered by two Pratt & Whitney or General Electric turbofan engines, which with afterburning can generate from 23,000 to 29,000 pounds of thrust, accelerating the aircraft to more than twice the speed of sound. The single-seat air-superiority version is armed with a 20-millimetre rotary cannon and an array of short-range and medium-range air-to-air missiles. In the fighter-bomber version, known as the Strike Eagle, a weapons officer seated behind the pilot controls the delivery of a number of guided missiles and bombs. The Strike Eagle carried out much of the nighttime precision bombing of Iraqi installations during the Persian Gulf War of 1990-91.

It would appear then that the F-15 is 25 years older than the MiG-29. This does not seem like much when in the early game turns are 50 years apart but by the 20th Century turns= a year. So, Firaxis should not worry about giving us a WW II plane, a F-15, and then a MiG-29. Of course they would also throw a couple of bombers in.

Dom Pedro II
Prince
Ridgefield Park, NJ, USA
Nov 1999
posted January 08, 2001 23:50   Click Here to See the Profile for Dom Pedro IIClick Here to Email Dom Pedro II  send a private message to Dom Pedro II
Edit/Delete Message    Reply To And Quote This Message
IP: Logged, Admin Access Only
I dunno, the Mig and F-15 much like the Abrams and Panzer seem excessive to me. In my opinion, since the game is new everytime, we shouldn't push for EXACT military models. We should only have very general unit concepts instead. Like a Tank, a Jet, a Bomber, etc. No need for such specifics. And like I've said before for the finnicky, the game should be customizable enough that you can create your own extra units if you really CAN'T live without two separate jet fighters.
Sirotnikov
Prince
Israel
Feb 2000
posted January 09, 2001 13:51   Click Here to See the Profile for SirotnikovClick Here to Email Sirotnikov  send a private message to SirotnikovSend a Message to UIN: 18345800
Edit/Delete Message    Reply To And Quote This Message
IP: Logged, Admin Access Only
I tend to agree with dom pedro.

It seems exessive. The tanks and jets are too different to have it as the same unit for different civs, and having different unit every 50 turns is annoying.

But I'm ranting enough in my thread so I'll let firaxis show me how does their game make it all work great.

The Kaiser
Chieftain
Stoke-on-Trent, England
Dec 1999
posted January 10, 2001 17:53   Click Here to See the Profile for The Kaiser   send a private message to The Kaiser
Edit/Delete Message    Reply To And Quote This Message
IP: Logged, Admin Access Only
Despite the fact that both the Mig29 and the F15 could in some versions be classified as Strike aircraft, a closer look at the unit graphics reveals their intended role in the game. The Mig29 is carrying Air to Air Missiles wheras the F15 is carrying mostly Air to Ground Munitions. Thus I suggest we have simply a Jet Fighter Unit and a Jet Fighter/Bomber Unit.

I say "Jet" as I expect there to be a Standard Propellar Fighter Unit and a Prop Fighter/Bomber(P-51,Me-410). It can be expected that a dedicated Bomber Unit would appear in these 2 classifications also, say a Lancaster and a B-52. Plus we also have the Stealth Planes which will feature later in the game.

I hope perhaps Dive Bombers will feature in the final game, but I fear that these will be left out to avoid over complicating the game.

Apolyton Civilization Site Forums
> > > Civ3-General/Suggestions Forum

next newest topic | next oldest topictop of page

All times are EDT

Administrative Options: Close Topic | Archive/Move | Delete Topic | Top
Post New Topic  Post A ReplyPost A Reply In A New Window
Hop to:

Contact Us
Apolyton Civilization Site

Powered by: Ultimate Bulletin Board, Version 5.44a
© Infopop Corporation (formerly Madrona Park, Inc.), 1998 - 2000.

Front Page | Civilization III | Dinosaurs | Civilization II | Call to Power | Call to Power II | Alpha Centauri | Alternative Civs | Misc | Links | About ACS | GameStats
GameLeague | Scenario League | HAC | Civilization Scenario Collection | Spanish CivII Site | Clash of Civs | CtP Maps | Art of War | WesW's Ctp1/2 Site