Apolyton Archive  |  Preserved copy of the Apolyton Civilization Site forums as they ran on Ultimate Bulletin Board, 1998–2001. Read-only; nothing here can be posted to or replied to.  |  Forum index |  About this archive |  The 2005 site & forums

  Apolyton Civilization Site Forums
  Civ3-General/Suggestions
  A tech tree that loses branches?

Post New Topic  Post A ReplyPost A Reply In A New Window

profile | register | preferences | faq | search next newest topic | next oldest topic bottom of page
Author
Topic:   A tech tree that loses branches? Format for Better Printing
Theben
Emperor
Indianapolis, #1 in Syph cases!
b.02-15-99
posted January 03, 2001 02:25   Click Here to See the Profile for ThebenClick Here to Email Theben  send a private message to Theben
Edit/Delete Message    Reply To And Quote This Message
IP: Logged, Admin Access Only
China supposedly was ready for an industrial revolution back in the 14th century, but did not take it. The Greeks invented the concept of the Steam Engine in pre-Christian times, but never launched any ironclads! Technology and paths to tech can be lost. So what I am wondering is would it be feasible, from a game standpoint, to have technology make other tech paths obsolete as well as make new ones available?
eNo
Settler
Canada
Dec 2000
posted January 03, 2001 12:50   Click Here to See the Profile for eNo   send a private message to eNo
Edit/Delete Message    Reply To And Quote This Message
IP: Logged, Admin Access Only
Doesn't that happen anyways? I can't remember for CivII but I know that in SMAC I tend to get the more powerful weapons before the weaker ones because I simply didn't need the tech branch that those weaker weapons were on. Those weaker weapons only became available when I did need those couple of techs at the end of the branch.

I don't think new techs should make older ones unresearchable because it would cause prerequisite problems later on. Make them less worth while to research would make sense though.

Mihai
Settler
Romania
Jan 2001
posted January 06, 2001 16:38   Click Here to See the Profile for MihaiClick Here to Email Mihai  send a private message to MihaiSend a Message to UIN: 102038080
Edit/Delete Message    Reply To And Quote This Message
IP: Logged, Admin Access Only
IMO in SMAC that is a flaw of the game.

Historically speaking there were a lot of inventions that were lost because they were never put in practice at large scale or at all.
If the tech tree will have many branches and theoretical tech separate of practical tech (Gunpowder tech => Musket/Musketeer tech for Musketeer unit), then it could be same limits : if you don't buid a Musketeer unit in 50 turn after you discover Musketeer tech you'll lose that tech; if you don't dicover (or at least reserch) a tech on the branch of Gunpowder in 200 turn you will lose Gunpowder.
For that it should be more turns in every Age and tech should be harder to discover. That way you can build an army of musketeers and use it before you get rifleman.

What do you say about secret reserch (it would cost you more RP or rather same money) that the other players don't know about it even they have embassy? Only spy can see them.

Windborne
Settler
lansing, michigan, usa
Jan 2001
posted January 07, 2001 18:23   Click Here to See the Profile for WindborneClick Here to Email Windborne  send a private message to Windborne
Edit/Delete Message    Reply To And Quote This Message
IP: Logged, Admin Access Only
Space Empires IV solved this problem very nicely. They have three different technology trees available for players to research. One of them deals exculsively with weapon/unit concepts, one with general technologies like banking or agriculture, and the most important one deal with theoretical research.

Under such a system you might research "physics level one" which opens up "physics level two" on the theoritical research tree, and technologies such as "Bronze working" on the general technology tree.

Bronze working in turn opens up a number of units to you in the Units/weapons list, including the phalanx but also several other units as well.

Similiarly "domestication" on the theoritical research tree would open up a list of animals that could be domesticated. Learning to domesticate the horse would give you access to "horseback riding", "carts", and "The moldboard plow".

Each theoretical advance you learn would open up new advance to you on one or more of the lists. Then you could choose whether to go after more theoretical knowledge, new units, or more general technology to improve your civilization. It works great in SEIV.


[This message has been edited by Windborne (edited January 07, 2001).]

Evil Capitalist
King
The man with the Golden Gnu.
Jul 2000
posted January 07, 2001 18:41   Click Here to See the Profile for Evil CapitalistClick Here to Email Evil Capitalist  send a private message to Evil CapitalistSend a Message to UIN: 82420241
Edit/Delete Message    Reply To And Quote This Message
IP: Logged, Admin Access Only
Small points- The start of the industrial revolution has at least 30 provisos that historians think are important. It's no surprise China missed out.

Also Hero's steam engine was by ne means comparable to 18th entury British deisgns such as Newcommen or Watt engines. The Greeks were unable to make any real form of propulsion

eNo
Settler
Canada
Dec 2000
posted January 07, 2001 18:43   Click Here to See the Profile for eNo   send a private message to eNo
Edit/Delete Message    Reply To And Quote This Message
IP: Logged, Admin Access Only
Windborne, I like the sound of that Space Empires system but I'll actually have to play it to make a valid judgement.

The time I wouldn't mind branches falling is if the tech tree was diverging instead of converging. That way there would be less prerequitiste problems and each "branch" would have it's own ways of filling needs. ie automation vs. slavery. Wasn't the reason why the steam engine never took of during the Classical period was because the Romans had so many slaves that it was cheaper to use human labour than machinery?

Jer8m8
Chieftain
New York, America
Nov 2000
posted January 07, 2001 19:32   Click Here to See the Profile for Jer8m8Click Here to Email Jer8m8  send a private message to Jer8m8
Edit/Delete Message    Reply To And Quote This Message
IP: Logged, Admin Access Only
I don't know if anybody saw the History Channel's "Modern Marvels Challenge," but in it they had to "rediscover" how Ceaser built a bridge over the Rhine in 10 days. We forgot how to do this!-Likewise, we have also forgotton languages. We do forget.

My idea:You pay an initial research price in beakers. Each turn after its complete, a beaker is lost and you will have to "resupply" it. When all the beakers are gone, a message like "Sir, if we don't reresearch ______ in 5 turns, we will forget it for eternity."

Also: in order to resupply, two changes should be made to the Tax/science/luxury bars:1. you should be able to move the sliders by ones and 2. you should be able to subdivide your science meter into new science and remembering old science. The old science part will automatically put more emphasis on the techs closest to being forgotten unless you don't care. But, if you forgot a tech and you find unreadable hieroglyphics (which would give you a science bonus if you could read them) then you will be sorry.
One final comment:you should have an option at the beginning if you do or don't want to be able to lose techs

Windborne
Settler
lansing, michigan, usa
Jan 2001
posted January 08, 2001 07:57   Click Here to See the Profile for WindborneClick Here to Email Windborne  send a private message to Windborne
Edit/Delete Message    Reply To And Quote This Message
IP: Logged, Admin Access Only
I don't like the idea of having to supply shields to keep technology, but I do think we should be able to have "dark ages" where a culture forgets certain techs.

Perhaps a better way to do this would be to base it on natural events, for instance if the culture lost 10% or more of it's cities there might be a random chance of it losing a technology or two in the turmoil.

Apolyton Civilization Site Forums
> > > Civ3-General/Suggestions Forum

next newest topic | next oldest topictop of page

All times are EDT

Administrative Options: Close Topic | Archive/Move | Delete Topic | Top
Post New Topic  Post A ReplyPost A Reply In A New Window
Hop to:

Contact Us
Apolyton Civilization Site

Powered by: Ultimate Bulletin Board, Version 5.44a
© Infopop Corporation (formerly Madrona Park, Inc.), 1998 - 2000.

Front Page | Civilization III | Dinosaurs | Civilization II | Call to Power | Call to Power II | Alpha Centauri | Alternative Civs | Misc | Links | About ACS | GameStats
GameLeague | Scenario League | HAC | Civilization Scenario Collection | Spanish CivII Site | Clash of Civs | CtP Maps | Art of War | WesW's Ctp1/2 Site