|
Author
|
|
Topic: Allies sharing wonder abilities |  |
|
Grrr
Chieftain
New Zealand
Dec 2000
|
 |
posted December 13, 2000 17:17
   | 
 |
 |  |
In an alliance, the allies civs should be able to reap the benefits of each others wonders. This should stop, however on the moment the alliance is canceled. If allies could share wonders, this would make "team" games, easier. However, this should only apply to the allies, and not the allies allies. Otherwise everybody would just ally and the whole game would have access to the wonders.:P Grrr |
Diablo, Bro. of Mephisto
Warlord
Salt Lake City, USA
Oct 2000
|
 |
posted December 13, 2000 22:33
|
|
| |
I do like this idea, worth discussion. |
DarkCloud
King
of Clouds
Jul 2000
|
|
posted December 14, 2000 20:57
 |
|
| |
This should be in Civ III. |
DrFell
Chieftain
England
Sep 2000
|
 |
posted December 15, 2000 22:46
|
|
| |
i think this should depend on the wonder... how realistic would it be for 2 civs to share the great wall??? but something like marco polos or bachs should be shareable. this just seems realistic. allies in general should be much more willing to share (not like in mge or tot).
[This message has been edited by DrFell (edited December 15, 2000).] |
yin26
Civ3 Forums Moderator
Work in Seoul, Korea. From Los Angeles.
Apr 99
|
|
posted December 16, 2000 01:53
|
|
| |
In fact, I think that certain Wonders, such as Cure for Cancer, should be of exclusive benefit to ONLY you for a set number of turns. After which, other nations, including enemy nations, will petition you for the technology. If you refuse, your reputation will suffer...and perhaps lead to all nations ganging up on you. This way, wonders not only stay more balanced throughout the game, but they add another interesting avenue for diplomatic decisions. |
QW1020
Settler
Dec 2000
|
|
posted December 16, 2000 14:15
|
|
| |
good idea |
red_jon
Prince
of Eastbourne. (UK)
Oct 2000
|
|
posted December 17, 2000 16:23
|
|
| |
What about nations joint-building wonders? The French built the Statue of Liberty for the Americans, Womens Suffrage was done by women in Britian and the US (but more Britian).------------------
"We shall fight on the beaches, we shall fight on the landing grounds, we shall fight in the fields and in the streets, we shall fight in the hills, we shall never surrender!" -Winston Churchill "Gotta love me"- Baby, Dinosaurs |
Grrr
Chieftain
New Zealand
Dec 2000
|
|
posted December 17, 2000 19:19
|
|
| |
quote:
Originally posted by red_jon on 12-17-2000 04:23 PM
What about nations joint-building wonders? The French built the Statue of Liberty for the Americans, Womens Suffrage was done by women in Britian and the US (but more Britian).
|
??? Excuse Me, women's suffrage was first granted in NEW ZEALAND in 1893, a hell of a long time before Britain and America got it. |
red_jon
Prince
of Eastbourne. (UK)
Oct 2000
|
|
posted December 18, 2000 14:28
|
|
| |
It was also granted in Germany before the UK and US. Sorry, didn't know about NZ.But I think the wonder is about the suffering the women went through to get womens suffrage (in the UK a woman died from throwing herself at the king's horse). Still, its getting off topic. ------------------
"We shall fight on the beaches, we shall fight on the landing grounds, we shall fight in the fields and in the streets, we shall fight in the hills, we shall never surrender!" -Winston Churchill "Gotta love me"- Baby, Dinosaurs |
Apolyton Civilization Site Forums
