|
Author
|
|
Topic: Down With "Prepared Governments"! |  |
|
Christantine The Great
Warlord
of the city-state of Christantinople
Jun 2000
|
 |
posted November 26, 2000 17:57
   | 
 |
 |  |
Well, what do you think. Should Civ III use SE or use prepared governments like in Civ II. Here are some pros and cons.
Pros:
SE: Many combos possible; have a unique government. Governments: Simple; civs cannot be better because of their government because the others will eventually catch up. Cons: SE: since Civ does not use idologies the civs might all use the same combo. Governments: Absolutly no flexability. Well? |
Nikolai
Chieftain
Bergen, Norway, Hordaland
Oct 2000
|
 |
posted November 27, 2000 09:26
|
|
| |
Personally I would prefere SE governments, because it would be more options and coustomibility. For example, here in Norway we have a king, but we are also a democracy. In civ as we have it now, this would be impossible.  Of course it is many more important things it can be used to, maybe it could be possible to make our own economical systems!!  Just think of a N O - M O N E Y - communistic-thougth-control government!  ------------------
Who am I? What am I? Do we need Civ? Yes!!
birteaw@online.no |
Sirotnikov
Prince
Israel
Feb 2000
|
 |
posted November 27, 2000 18:30
|
|
| |
I think it should be a very wide SE system. After all, even the democracies now days are so very different and complex that there's no chance of "one" democracy representing both brittain, usa, israel, sweden etc.I suggest the following new fields: attitude:
Fascistic - Nationalistic - Neutral - Universal
rule by:
one man - small govt. - parliament - people's rally
|
Christantine The Great
Warlord
of the city-state of Christantinople
Jun 2000
|
 |
posted November 30, 2000 16:32
|
|
| |
BUMPNo one has any more to say?!? |
Psion
Settler
Maryland, USA
Jun 99
|
|
posted December 01, 2000 20:19
|
|
| |
I'm for SE, as long as its better than SMAC's was. It should be more in-depth with more combinations and choices. |
Apolyton Civilization Site Forums
