|
Author
|
|
Topic: funding of city improvements |  |
|
JEEVES
Settler
LA CROSSE, WI
Nov 2000
|
 |
posted November 19, 2000 23:36
  | 
 |
 |  |
I propose getting rid of general maintanace costs and implementing funding. For instance, a library's effectiveness would depend on on the amount of funding. If it gets maximal (100%) it will be an excellent school, and enhance science production. If the school gets, say, 20% funding it will be poor and have a minimal effect on science. The same could be said for university, library, etc. There should be a minimal percentage for basic maintanace, but the rest of the funding goes to the quality of the improvement. This would bring a welcome complexity to the game. It would make income and trade more important. Another added complexity could be that of a localized economy. As in real life, high tech companies, need specialized people. In the game, a research center (or equivalent) could be built, but in order to run at peak efficiency, the city would need proper workers to work there. This is all of the top of my head. This stuff would bring some relief to the old basic system and equations. I think the "rush buy" option should go. It doesn't make any sense. It isn't realistic at all. |
Evil Capitalist
King
sized bed and minibar in each room
Jul 2000
|
|
posted November 20, 2000 02:33
  |
|
| |
I'm not so sure- I think the autoselling of improvements is meant to signify recession, and as such is needed in the game. Although if funding were set on an empire wide level it could work.And IMO rush buying is a valuable part of the city interface- politicans throwing money at a project until it goes away. |
UltraSonix
King
Melbourne, Australia
May 2000
|
|
posted November 20, 2000 07:36
 |
|
| |
There is absolutely nothing wrong with the suggestion - it's actually quite good. But I like the way Civ2 works now... it's very easy to manage.As as to the percentage funding proposal - I think it's more Sim City than civ - it seems to be focused on the cities too much. ------------------
No, in Australia we don't live with kangaroos and koalas in our backyards... Despite any stupid advertisments you may see to the contrary... (And no, koalas don't usually speak!) |
airdrik
Chieftain
Boise, ID, USA
Oct 2000
|
|
posted November 20, 2000 13:21
|
|
| |
Actually it already has funding, to a degree. The science rate. The higher you put your science rate, the more 'funding' is given to your schools, libraries, etc. So I believe it is rather uneeded to have another 'funding' level in the game. | |
Apolyton Civilization Site Forums
