|
Author
|
|
Topic: Cities in Disorder succeed from the Union |  |
|
jrhughes98 Settler Nashville, Tennessee US Oct 2000
|
 |
posted October 24, 2000 20:00
 |
 |
 |  |
Here's a cool idea for Civ3! How about this? A city that has been in civil disorder long enough or just goes into severe civil disorder might succeed from the Union and form their own civilization, or join an existing civilization. The farther the city is from the capitol, the more likely that city will succeed if it falls into civil disorder. And if other cities near a city that succeeds fall into civil disorder, they are more likely succeed as well. When this happens, you can declare a civil war and try to get those cities back. This makes a lot of sense, for example: British cities become American cities, Spanish cities become Mexican Cities. American cities become Confederate cities, etc. There should be an option to not allow succeeding if the human player(s) do not prefer it for a particular game.------------------ JRH |
Shadowstrike King Mississauga, Ontario, Canada Jul 2000
|
 |
posted October 24, 2000 20:02
 |
 |
 |  |
There's a similar discussion going on in the "Revolutions" thread. Go check it out! |
jrhughes98 Settler Nashville, Tennessee US Oct 2000
|
 |
posted October 24, 2000 20:08
 |
 |
 |  |
How do I find the "Revolutions" thread?------------------ JRH |
jrhughes98 Settler Nashville, Tennessee US Oct 2000
|
 |
posted October 24, 2000 20:54
 |
 |
 |  |
oh, nevermind!
------------------ JRH |
UltraSonix King Melbourne, Australia May 2000
|
 |
posted October 24, 2000 22:21
 |
 |
 |  |
!------------------ No, in Australia we don't live with kangaroos and koalas in our backyards... Despite any stupid advertisments you may see to the contrary... |
Tim White Chieftain Kearns, Utah, USA Oct 2000
|
 |
posted October 24, 2000 23:16
 |
 |
 |  |
I did a thread on this myself, not exactly like yours, but in the same idea, its at "Riots and Revolutions", it went nearly unawnsered. Go check it out if ya like. |
JamesJKirk Warlord Dixon, CA USA b.02-15-99
|
 |
posted October 25, 2000 21:59
 |
 |
 |  |
Yeah, I had an idea just like that back when we were discussing what should be in CTP. No, really. I suggested having certain-named tribes split from the main one, like Confederates from Americans, Texans from Mexicans, Bavarians from Germans, etc, etc ,etc. and yes, I was ignored too! |
Adm.Naismith Prince Milano - Italy Oct 1999
|
 |
posted October 26, 2000 11:17
|
 |
 |  |
Just for info, I noticed that posts referring to argument already debated some times ago, more often if included in "The List" or "Essential Civ", receive not many answers if any at all.My suggestion is, when this happen, to take the hint and search deeply into the forum or to check "The List v.2" itself.  ------------------ Admiral Naismith AKA mcostant | |