|
Author
|
|
Topic: One small thing that may have been mentioned |  |
|
Smash
King
Vancouver Canada pacific time
Jul 1999
|
 |
posted October 18, 2000 13:41
   | 
 |
 |  |
If there is to be a "find city" option it should be limited to your cities only.Especially for multiplayer. |
Crustacian
Prince
North Idaho PST
Jul 1999
|
|
posted October 18, 2000 14:51
|
|
| |
Amen. Otherwise the city might as well show up on the map for all to see  |
UltraSonix
King
Melbourne, Australia
May 2000
|
|
posted October 18, 2000 18:45
  |
|
| |
I thought that without turning the cheat on, you could only search for cities that you have revealed (ie can see other civs' cities), but you couldn't find cities you had not yet revealed...------------------
No, in Australia we don't live with kangaroos and koalas in our backyards... Despite any stupid advertisments you may see to the contrary... |
Tim White
Chieftain
Kearns, Utah, USA
Oct 2000
|
|
posted October 23, 2000 15:53
|
|
| |
I also agree, it is very rediculous that you should be able to see a city that you have not even found, I mean, does your civ have radar domes at 3000 BC?? |
DarkCloud
Prince
of Posts
Jul 2000
|
|
posted October 23, 2000 22:15
|
|
| |
Find city should be for 1. cities you have already seen in your civ
2. A second Find City option for find Foreign City but only for those which your map reveals. |
Mo
Warlord
Apr 99
|
|
posted October 23, 2000 22:42
|
|
| |
I disagree if you have somewhat friendly relations with another civ you should be able to see where all their cities are. I would atribute this to travelers traveling through their nation. This should reign true for all cities with a wonder in them. Most wonders generate tourism and there for a lot of people know where they are. If you aren't allied with a civ almost the only way to find out where its cities are located is to steal its map or send a diplomate exploring which is a bit unreasonable. |
Apolyton Civilization Site Forums
