Apolyton Archive  |  Preserved copy of the Apolyton Civilization Site forums as they ran on Ultimate Bulletin Board, 1998–2001. Read-only; nothing here can be posted to or replied to.  |  Forum index |  About this archive |  The 2005 site & forums

  Apolyton Civilization Site Forums-archives
  
  Does this work? (Page 2)

Post New Topic  Post A ReplyPost A Reply In A New Window

This topic is 2 pages long:   1  2  profile | register | preferences | faq | search next newest topic | next oldest topic bottom of page
Author
Topic:   Does this work? Format for Better Printing
Smash


b.02-15-99
posted June 08, 2000 11:51   Click Here to See the Profile for SmashClick Here to Email Smash Visit Smash's Homepage!
Edit/Delete Message    Reply To And Quote This Message
IP: Logged, Admin Access Only
huh?
Tom DeMille


b.02-15-99
posted June 08, 2000 13:14   Click Here to See the Profile for Tom DeMilleClick Here to Email Tom DeMille Visit Tom DeMille's Homepage!
Edit/Delete Message    Reply To And Quote This Message
IP: Logged, Admin Access Only
I think Steve is suggesting you write yourself an app in C. A bit tricky for a non programmer. I remember using Think C for the mac a decade ago, but unfortunately don't have a mac compiler available right now. If I did I'd write a quick and dirty text editor for you.

Do you have a Java interpreter installed on your machine? I could bang off a Java text editor for you.

Or you could try http://www.mac.org/utilities/texeditplus/ . This is a mac text editor that mentions it will reformat text for MS-DOS BBSs. This might save the text in the right format.

It's interesting that the Mac doesn't have trouble with the extra carriage return character in DOS text files. I guess it just ingores it.

edit: Or, you can just tell pc people to fix the damn text file themselves. It's not hard. Just open it in wordpad (or any word processor other than notepad), and resave it as a straight text file.
[This message has been edited by Tom DeMille (edited June 08, 2000).]

Steve Clark


b.02-15-99
posted June 08, 2000 13:57   Click Here to See the Profile for Steve ClarkClick Here to Email Steve Clark Visit Steve Clark's Homepage!
Edit/Delete Message    Reply To And Quote This Message
IP: Logged, Admin Access Only
Actually, I was just trying to be cleverly funny. Guess it didn't work.
Tom DeMille


b.02-15-99
posted June 08, 2000 14:25   Click Here to See the Profile for Tom DeMilleClick Here to Email Tom DeMille Visit Tom DeMille's Homepage!
Edit/Delete Message    Reply To And Quote This Message
IP: Logged, Admin Access Only
quote:

#include <iostream.h>
cout << "string\n";
or
cout << "string" << end1;
where 'string' is the text string.

Oh, I just got it! Ha, ha! Good old American humour.
[This message has been edited by Tom DeMille (edited June 08, 2000).]

SCG


b.02-15-99
posted June 08, 2000 14:59   Click Here to See the Profile for SCGClick Here to Email SCG Visit SCG's Homepage!
Edit/Delete Message    Reply To And Quote This Message
IP: Logged, Admin Access Only
quote:


#include <iostream.h>
cout << "string\n";
or
cout << "string" << end1;
where 'string' is the text string.


As someone who has just spend much of the last 6 hrs helping people proofread their beginning Ada and C programs, I guess I'm still in that mindset

So, actually this is a C++ program, not a C program, if anyone really wanted to try that out somewhere C would use printf statements instead, as well as a slightly different file to include. The printf statement in place of cout might have even helped Smash get the gist of the code just from context.

also, can anyone spot the typo in the alternate way to print a new line?

thats right! the 1 should be an l
(lower case 'L')


As one other side note to the actual problem, I'm surprised I didn't think of that - there are a lot of people who load their programs from notepad to UNIX and I always have them do a search and replace on all those pesky little carriage returns (^M) - they don't affect anything compilerwise, but do confuse text editors like emacs.

and my appologies to Tom and Steve - like i said, i've been spending too long today pointing out the obvious and just couldn't help myself

edit: odd - I just tried to edit this page, since the <iostream.h> was missing in my original post - but its already there???

wonder if it will show up this time :|
[This message has been edited by SCG (edited June 08, 2000).]

SilverDragon


b.02-15-99
posted June 08, 2000 17:23   Click Here to See the Profile for SilverDragonClick Here to Email SilverDragon Visit SilverDragon's Homepage!
Edit/Delete Message    Reply To And Quote This Message
IP: Logged, Admin Access Only
How could you win without shake's and INs? What's the point of being able to have an extra city for only one turn? I'm curious.
Smash


b.02-15-99
posted June 08, 2000 22:39   Click Here to See the Profile for SmashClick Here to Email Smash Visit Smash's Homepage!
Edit/Delete Message    Reply To And Quote This Message
IP: Logged, Admin Access Only
I have no idea what you guys are talkng about so it ends here ...For now.

I tryed to make a OCC game that would have things that I think make it hard.No Shake's means Mono and cathedral slowing the effect of "we love days"

No Ike's means slower science.

Less civ means less help with techs and tribute.

I made 2 civs have vendettas but it doesn't give consistant results.

It was meant as a small puzzle just for something different.You'll notice the city is not well placed for OCC.I wanted the player to have to build a palace and have a supported settler as a result of disbanding Mingapulco.You can't disband with 1 city so it was meant to give few seconds of puzzle solving.

It can be won relatively easily depending on what "Evan" and "Venger" do.First 2 tests I was wiped out by 3 triremes of knights that "Evan" sent.I tweaked it alittle and I landed in 1930s.

MacUser


b.02-15-99
posted June 10, 2000 10:02   Click Here to See the Profile for MacUserClick Here to Email MacUser Visit MacUser's Homepage!
Edit/Delete Message    Reply To And Quote This Message
IP: Logged, Admin Access Only
Tom, SCG and Steve: You guys are just too damn tough! Talk about "Code Warriors"! Don't want to meet you guys in a dark ally with only AppleScript at my side! It's all I can do to change the Type and Creator codes in ResEdit! This is why I bought the book "Mac Programming for Dummies" (which I never got around to reading )! FYI: it came with a free copy of CodeWarrior Lite compiler and Apples resource editor ResEdit.

I now feel enlighted and educated! Plus I get to write the authors of MacSecrets and point out their error about ASCII being cross-platform!

------------------
Different is GOOD!

AOL IM--JacSamDad
[This message has been edited by MacUser (edited June 10, 2000).]

Apolyton Civilization Site Forums-archives
> > > Forum

This topic is 2 pages long:   1  2 
next newest topic | next oldest topictop of page

All times are EDT

Administrative Options: Close Topic | Archive/Move | Delete Topic | Top
Post New Topic  Post A ReplyPost A Reply In A New Window
Hop to:

Contact Us
Apolyton Civilization Site

Powered by: Ultimate Bulletin Board, Version 5.44a
© Infopop Corporation (formerly Madrona Park, Inc.), 1998 - 2000.

AltaVista Type or paste text or Web address (beginning with http://) here:
Powered
by Systran
Translate from: 

Front Page | Civilization III | Dinosaurs | Civilization II | Call to Power | Call to Power II | Alpha Centauri | Alternative Civs | Misc | Links | About ACS | GameStats
GameLeague | Scenario League | HAC | Civilization Scenario Collection | Spanish CivII Site | Clash of Civs | CtP Maps | Art of War | WesW's Ctp1/2 Site