Apolyton Archive  |  Preserved copy of the Apolyton Civilization Site forums as they ran on Ultimate Bulletin Board, 1998–2001. Read-only; nothing here can be posted to or replied to.  |  Forum index |  About this archive |  The 2005 site & forums

  Apolyton Civilization Site Forums
  CtP2-Creation
  Ambush terrain feature, combat anyalsis

Post New Topic  Post A ReplyPost A Reply In A New Window

profile | register | preferences | faq | search next newest topic | next oldest topic bottom of page
Author
Topic:   Ambush terrain feature, combat anyalsis Format for Better Printing
Hannibal Ad Portas
Settler
IOW UK
Feb 2001
posted February 25, 2001 16:10   Click Here to See the Profile for Hannibal Ad PortasClick Here to Email Hannibal Ad Portas  send a private message to Hannibal Ad Portas
Edit/Delete Message    Reply To And Quote This Message
IP: Logged, Admin Access Only
I was looking for a way to represent ambushes, like Varus in Germany,
Lake Traismine, where one side was caught unprepared for combat either
through poor deplyment, surprise attack whilst crossing a river etc, their
are many examles of this type of event in history.

This is what i come up with so far.

So, there are two special terrain types not used in a regular game see
terrain.txt, reuse bottom one for a new terrain type,call it low hills
with same stats as normal hills,possibly lower movement rate,change its
combat modifier to a negative.Easy i thought,and tested out some sample
combat,matched some units up from a number of different terrain types.

The battle screen its reporting +-100%, but the actual combats are not
coming out as you would excpect them to.Any thoughts??

As a bonus if you use special 2 for your terrain you get to fight
a coastal battle screen.

Its not to do with the reuse of the terrain tiles as i have been using
them for some time with no problems in regular combat were all bonuses
were positive.

Here is the data, all units were 30Attack 20 defence sat adjacent prior
to combat.7 units vs 7 units.Mountain have only 3 combats as their very
one sided and dont need to big a sample.

Attcking fromGrass to defending on AmbushTerrain +-100%
Attacker has 1,2,3,5,1,2 units left after 6 combats

Attcking fromAmbushTerrain to defending on AmbushTerrain +-100%
Attacker has 5,1,2 defender has 3,4,2

Attcking fromAmbushTerrain to defending on Grass 0%
Attacker has 4,4,1 defender has 1,3,2

Attcking fromMountain to defending on Grass 0%
Attacker has 7,6,7 (very healthy)

Attcking fromGrass to defending MonMountain +100%
defender has 7,7,7 (very healthy)

Attcking fromMountain to defending fromMountain +100%
Attacker has 2,3 units left defender has 2,2,2,1, units left

This highlights the importance of the terrain you attack from.You may
think this irrelevant or boring but without proper documentation i see
no other way to fully understand the combat mechanics of this game. So
why does the top example which has the same 100% modifier not produce
a similiar set of results as the bottom example?

hexagonian
Prince
hither and yon
Jun 99
posted February 25, 2001 19:50   Click Here to See the Profile for hexagonian   send a private message to hexagonian
Edit/Delete Message    Reply To And Quote This Message
IP: Logged, Admin Access Only
See Wes' post in the CTP2 General forum regarding this issue.

Basically, he thinks that the combat structure is different from the past - each battle is a series of attacks where the units switch back and forth from attacker to defender.

Terrain now plays a factor for both attackers and defenders.

If correct, this will change things if you are attempting to modify units. I have to look at my own setup now.
[This message has been edited by hexagonian (edited February 25, 2001).]

XMon
Chieftain
Tampa, Florida
Sep 2000
posted February 25, 2001 22:03   Click Here to See the Profile for XMonClick Here to Email XMon  send a private message to XMon
Edit/Delete Message    Reply To And Quote This Message
IP: Logged, Admin Access Only
Uggghhh...I don't like this. If an army of hoplites on a mountain attack an army of hoplites on grassland...why would they have such a tremendous advantage? They do have to fight close-up on common ground. Unless you figure they built up a lot of momentum running down that mountain.
Bluevoss
Warlord
Orlando, Florida
Dec 2000
posted February 25, 2001 23:20   Click Here to See the Profile for BluevossClick Here to Email Bluevoss  send a private message to Bluevoss
Edit/Delete Message    Reply To And Quote This Message
IP: Logged, Admin Access Only
Hoplites dont run. Not if they want to keep their critical formation together.

Still, traditionally, terrain favors the defender.

Ambushes should be handled (in a perfect world) with a chance that the defenders (and maybe, the attackers - base it off randomness and the vetran status) get a number of free attacks.

It would certainly give small units a chance to wipe out larger armys. And it was all Hannibal had going for him.

------------------
Bluevoss-

XMon
Chieftain
Tampa, Florida
Sep 2000
posted February 26, 2001 00:52   Click Here to See the Profile for XMonClick Here to Email XMon  send a private message to XMon
Edit/Delete Message    Reply To And Quote This Message
IP: Logged, Admin Access Only
I know they don't run...that's why the "rolleyes" smilie was there.

Hannibal: I suppose that you may want to rethink the ambush thing in that you would want to give the attackers a terrain with a high defensive bonus (a la mountain)...focusing on the attackers rather than the defenders. In my personal mod, I've made Jungle and Swamp terrains as TerrainType: Mountain so that tanks and other wheeled vehicles cannot travel thru them. You could also raise the defense bonus on such terrains so that attacking units could use jungle and swamp (and mountain of course) as the launching point for a successful ambush. Thinking of it as an ambush (striking from jungle, swamp or mountain) makes the skewed combat structure more palatable to me.

Hannibal Ad Portas
Settler
IOW UK
Feb 2001
posted February 26, 2001 05:19   Click Here to See the Profile for Hannibal Ad PortasClick Here to Email Hannibal Ad Portas  send a private message to Hannibal Ad Portas
Edit/Delete Message    Reply To And Quote This Message
IP: Logged, Admin Access Only
Xmon,
yep that works for me
XMon
Chieftain
Tampa, Florida
Sep 2000
posted February 26, 2001 21:44   Click Here to See the Profile for XMonClick Here to Email XMon  send a private message to XMon
Edit/Delete Message    Reply To And Quote This Message
IP: Logged, Admin Access Only
Ooops! I screwed up. Up above there I said I made jungle and swamp into TerrainType: Mountain. Wrong! I changed the MovementType from Land to Mountain. Sorry for any confusion.
Apolyton Civilization Site Forums
> > > CtP2-Creation Forum

next newest topic | next oldest topictop of page

All times are EDT

Administrative Options: Close Topic | Archive/Move | Delete Topic | Top
Post New Topic  Post A ReplyPost A Reply In A New Window
Hop to:

Contact Us
Apolyton Civilization Site

Powered by: Ultimate Bulletin Board, Version 5.44a
© Infopop Corporation (formerly Madrona Park, Inc.), 1998 - 2000.

AltaVista Type or paste text or Web address (beginning with http://) here:
Powered
by Systran
Translate from: 

Front Page | Civilization III | Dinosaurs | Civilization II | Call to Power | Call to Power II | Alpha Centauri | Alternative Civs | Misc | Links | About ACS | GameStats
GameLeague | Scenario League | HAC | Civilization Scenario Collection | Spanish CivII Site | Clash of Civs | CtP Maps | Art of War | WesW's Ctp1/2 Site