Apolyton Archive  |  Preserved copy of the Apolyton Civilization Site forums as they ran on Ultimate Bulletin Board, 1998–2001. Read-only; nothing here can be posted to or replied to.  |  Forum index |  About this archive |  The 2005 site & forums

  Apolyton Civilization Site Forums
  CtP2-General
  Keeping your forces up to date

Post New Topic  Post A ReplyPost A Reply In A New Window

profile | register | preferences | faq | search next newest topic | next oldest topic bottom of page
Author
Topic:   Keeping your forces up to date Format for Better Printing
Zardos
Settler
Minneapolis, MN, USA
Nov 2000
posted November 17, 2000 14:09   Click Here to See the Profile for ZardosClick Here to Email Zardos  send a private message to Zardos
Edit/Delete Message    Reply To And Quote This Message
IP: Logged, Admin Access Only
This strategy I employed in CTP1 and the CIV games, and it seems to work pretty well in CTP2.

I usually don't start active war campaigns until I reach gunpowder, because before then, it seems as though my units are not powerful enough to take over a city. This is especially the case in CTP2 because the AI does a lot better job at defending its cities.

When I am ready to start warring on the other civs I create two infantrymen (formerly musketeers) and two cannons in every city. I fortify one infantryman and one cannon in the city for defense, and the other two I send out to join up with my other cities' infantrymen and cannons. This way I can create a stack of 12 pretty quickly, with very good bombarding capabilites. Furthermore, I send out any old units that were fortified in the city.

I repeat this process when I reach Artillery, with machinegunners and artillery. My cities always have up-to-date units and I get a good stream of units to wage wars.

Any new cities I take over, I only create one of each defense unit and bombard unit, because I have found that the cities I conquer usually don't have all the improvements that I like to have.

I continue to do this every time I come across a new set of defense and bombard units. It seems to work pretty well.

However, of course, if there are mitigating circumstances (creating a wonder, a war that is not going so well) I raise or lower the priority of building those units.

MarkG
Apolyton CS Co-Administrator
Greece
b.02-15-99
posted November 17, 2000 16:31   Click Here to See the Profile for MarkGClick Here to Email MarkG  send a private message to MarkGSend a Message to UIN: 2865183 Visit MarkG's Homepage!
Edit/Delete Message    Reply To And Quote This Message
IP: Logged, Admin Access Only
i dont like dispanding units, so one thing i tend to do when i want to upgrade the defense units of my cities, is to build new ones, fortify them, and send the old to ones to war
Zardos
Settler
Minneapolis, MN, USA
Nov 2000
posted November 17, 2000 16:33   Click Here to See the Profile for ZardosClick Here to Email Zardos  send a private message to Zardos
Edit/Delete Message    Reply To And Quote This Message
IP: Logged, Admin Access Only
Neither do I. I hope I didn't give that impression. I always send out the old unit to war. At least they make good fodder while the cannons (artillery, whatever) tear things up!
MarkG
Apolyton CS Co-Administrator
Greece
b.02-15-99
posted November 17, 2000 20:24   Click Here to See the Profile for MarkGClick Here to Email MarkG  send a private message to MarkGSend a Message to UIN: 2865183 Visit MarkG's Homepage!
Edit/Delete Message    Reply To And Quote This Message
IP: Logged, Admin Access Only
yeah, you need to have a few defensive units for your center to take the big hits while your artillery smashes the opponent front line...
culturek
Settler
Clarkston
Nov 2000
posted November 18, 2000 12:19   Click Here to See the Profile for culturekClick Here to Email culturek  send a private message to culturek Visit culturek's Homepage!
Edit/Delete Message    Reply To And Quote This Message
IP: Logged, Admin Access Only
This is something I was going to post about today, so I'm glad you beat me to it!

I am the Russians in around 320 BC and I just got Infantrymen and Cannons. 90% of my 17 cities have 2 Hoplites defending them. I have 3 armies of about 3-4 Samuri with a Knight roaming around.

I'm not at war with anyone. I defeated the Americans in 1000 something BC because they were just filling my continent with little crappy cities. I wanted the land, they wouldn't give me any cities, so I beat them down in about 1000 years.

However, they were very skilled diplomats... They brought the Irish (the military power in my game) into my land as their allies I think. And they got the British to come to their aid in a similar way.

The British are now my allies and we have a peace treaty. Who said giving 1500 gold over 3 turns and then throwing a reception with a diplomat doesn't pay off? hehehe

However, the Irish are fortifying hoplites all over my continent! It is really annoying because they are taking out chunks of roads etc. The problem is that while I could easily dislodge the units, I don't want to start a war. I have Forbidden City, which I think is saving me right now, but I'm not so sure.

If I simply attack the Irish Hoplites, will they be able to declare war on me since I initiated it? I know forbidden city says that they can't but does that hold true even if I initiate the conflict?

Finally, and this is where force updating comes into play, how do I modernize my army effectively? Might makes right and nothing succeeds like success, but does this mean that I should make a bunch of powerful offensive units that AREN'T my best for offence and then use my BEST defensive units in my cities.

For example:

Offensive City Production:

2 Knights (about 11 turns for both)
2 Samuri (about 7 turns for both)

Defensive City Prodcution:

2 cannons (15 turns for 1)
2 infantrymen (13 turns for 1)

I'm really confused. I haven't seen any Irish Cities yet, but think that if I can hold them off for another 6-7 turns I could get another ally and pull a three on one. British, other Civ, and me vs. Irish.

Finally... Sea Power.... Anyone seeing the advantage in sea power until Ship of the Line or gunboat? I don't use the sea for commerce at all.

Thanks for any advice
CultureK

TopHat
Settler

Jun 99
posted November 19, 2000 12:37   Click Here to See the Profile for TopHat   send a private message to TopHat
Edit/Delete Message    Reply To And Quote This Message
IP: Logged, Admin Access Only
quote:

Originally posted by MarkG on 11-17-2000 04:31 PM
i dont like dispanding units, so one thing i tend to do when i want to upgrade the defense units of my cities, is to build new ones, fortify them, and send the old to ones to war


My maintenance costs got too high and I have the luxury of geographic isolation. Starting a war just to "retire" some older units seemed a little overkill to me. I like to move my obsolete units to one city (building a wonder) and cash them in there. This way I don't have to build a transport fleet (which would be more units to maintain).

MarkG
Apolyton CS Co-Administrator
Greece
b.02-15-99
posted November 19, 2000 15:23   Click Here to See the Profile for MarkGClick Here to Email MarkG  send a private message to MarkGSend a Message to UIN: 2865183 Visit MarkG's Homepage!
Edit/Delete Message    Reply To And Quote This Message
IP: Logged, Admin Access Only
quote:

Originally posted by TopHat on 11-19-2000 12:37 PM

My maintenance costs got too high and I have the luxury of geographic isolation. Starting a war just to "retire" some older units seemed a little overkill to me.
of course! i never suggested anything like that. it's just that usually, i'm at war with someone or preparing to get to war with someone

paulmagusnet
Settler
Boulder Creek,CA,USA
Nov 2000
posted November 19, 2000 21:29   Click Here to See the Profile for paulmagusnetClick Here to Email paulmagusnet  send a private message to paulmagusnet
Edit/Delete Message    Reply To And Quote This Message
IP: Logged, Admin Access Only
In the old game you lost points for cashing in units, has that been changed?
Solver
CtP/AC PBEM Ladder Administrator
Latvia, Riga
Sep 2000
posted November 20, 2000 07:52   Click Here to See the Profile for SolverClick Here to Email Solver  send a private message to SolverSend a Message to UIN: 101151010 Visit Solver's Homepage!
Edit/Delete Message    Reply To And Quote This Message
IP: Logged, Admin Access Only
Zardos: agreed, without gunpowder attacking isn't good. In CTP1, you had to use Cannons and Musketeers to get them, as using only non-ranged Cavalry would be easily countered by a city defended by both Pikemen and Cannons.
Mark: Agreed, disbanding units isn't good. Even old Knight when you're in the modern can do some work at picking empty cities, exploring the land and handling barbarians. And the maintenance cost for old units is low, making almost no difference in the amount of your payement.
Culturek: Cannons 320 BC? In Civ1, I was getting some amazing results: all techs by about 100AD, but I'm bot that good in CTP .

------------------
Solver - http://www.aok.20m.com

Chaos
Chieftain
Lebanon, In, USA
Jun 99
posted November 20, 2000 09:19   Click Here to See the Profile for ChaosClick Here to Email Chaos  send a private message to ChaosSend a Message to UIN: 14891866
Edit/Delete Message    Reply To And Quote This Message
IP: Logged, Admin Access Only
hmmmm I usually wait till I get tanks before I start a good shooting war. before that it always seemed too costly. with 4 tanks I can typically take a city. where with cannons and muskets it could take 2 stacks to get a well defended city. and I was always a perfectionist with my cities.

but that was ctp one.

so far this game I just got tanks. and I love them more than ever. and Battleships REALLY KICK BUTT!!!!!

I have a fleet of 5 right now and they are worth their weight in gold!

Zardos
Settler
Minneapolis, MN, USA
Nov 2000
posted November 20, 2000 10:15   Click Here to See the Profile for ZardosClick Here to Email Zardos  send a private message to Zardos
Edit/Delete Message    Reply To And Quote This Message
IP: Logged, Admin Access Only
Tanks rock.

Really there is no other way to put it. Right now I am at about 1980. I have wiped out the French, the English, the Scots, and the Japanese have one city left on a single square island (I have yet to get Marines). The Germans have 8 cities and the Native Americans have 11. I have about 60 or 70 tanks poised on the Germans border and I expect to, well, think of a hot knife and some butter.

Tanks seems to take damage well, dish it out really well, and move fast. They rip through machine gunners and artillery. Ahh, tanks.

On a side note, its kind of sad. Here I am, its 1980 and I have almost won the game (my first, medium difficulty). Its been a fantastic game (this is what CTP1 wanted to be) and I am impressed. Although, I have to say, if the AI doesn't improve much on higher levels (and I expect it would), I will never be able to discover some of the more advanced advances. I look forward to a "good" war with fusion tanks and other advanced units; the AI hitting back hard with a variety of different tactics.

Ahh well, I guess that what multiplayer is for -- anybody up for sitting around for about 30 to 40 hours trying to finish a game?

Zardos

Apolyton Civilization Site Forums
> > > CtP2-General Forum

next newest topic | next oldest topictop of page

All times are EDT

Administrative Options: Close Topic | Archive/Move | Delete Topic | Top
Post New Topic  Post A ReplyPost A Reply In A New Window
Hop to:

Contact Us
Apolyton Civilization Site

Powered by: Ultimate Bulletin Board, Version 5.44a
© Infopop Corporation (formerly Madrona Park, Inc.), 1998 - 2000.

AltaVista Type or paste text or Web address (beginning with http://) here:
Powered
by Systran
Translate from: 

Front Page | Civilization III | Dinosaurs | Civilization II | Call to Power | Call to Power II | Alpha Centauri | Alternative Civs | Misc | Links | About ACS | GameStats
GameLeague | Scenario League | HAC | Civilization Scenario Collection | Spanish CivII Site | Clash of Civs | CtP Maps | Art of War | WesW's Ctp1/2 Site