|
Author
|
|
Topic: 4th POLL: What kind of scenarios would you like? |  |
|
MarkG Apolyton CS Co-Administrator Greece b.02-15-99
|
 |
posted August 07, 2000 15:04
  |
 |
 |  |
FINAL RESULTS [This message has been edited by MarkG (edited October 29, 2000).]
|
Big Dave Prince Texas, USA Apr 99
|
 |
posted August 07, 2000 17:14
 |
 |
 |  |
Markos, Again I didn't vote, this time because you didn't have an "All of the above" choice. Can your polling software be configured for multiple choice or a "weighted list". By a weighted list I mean number the choices in the order you want them. The pick with the lowest number of votes is the most popular.And in actuality I'll probably come back and vote after I consider the choices for a while. ------------------ Big Dave A bad pun is its own reword. |
MarkG Apolyton CS Co-Administrator Greece b.02-15-99
|
 |
posted August 07, 2000 17:25
  |
 |
 |  |
1) an "all of the above" choice in this poll was useless. what good will such a vote mean? since you vote, it already means that you do want scenarios in the game...2) multiple choice or "weighted list" polls are not doable. in the end though, a weighted list will exist from the votes of all the people please choose the one you prefer the most and add a comment on what you might like second, etc... |
Sophanthro Apolyton CS Co-Administrator Greece b.02-15-99
|
 |
posted August 07, 2000 21:12
 |
 |
 |  |
I voted for Ancient Scenarios, because I felt that in Civ games esp. CTP the ancient times seem a little dull due to the small nature of your empire as well as the defensive nature of early CTP.Whats more important to me however is that the scenarios use as much SLIC as possible, so that they will not only be different from the regular game, but serve as examples and building blocks for scenario creators. Hmm maybe I should have voted for fantasy. Anyhow a short list of scenarios Id love to see. Colonization Cold War -- You've got MAD a scenario around it would cool. Ancient -- Alexander  Modern -- With the world as it is today, of course thats close to Cold War. American Civil War -- With the South having slaves, more experienced units to start, and the North having greater production. Maybe include England somehow. Rome -- Everybody wants to be caesar. At least one fantasy/fiction where you push SLIC to the max. |
PMLF Settler Rio de Janeiro,Brazil Jul 2000
|
 |
posted August 09, 2000 00:25
 |
 |
 |  |
I would like to see the following scenarios :1)World War I(1914-18) 2)Middle East Wars(1947-today) 3)XV-XVI Centuries 4)Iberian Reconquista(Reconquest) 5)Balkanic Wars(1991-today) |
Nemo Warlord
Apr 99
|
 |
posted August 09, 2000 01:12
|
 |
 |  |
Originally, I was thinking both the middle and modern ages equally, because those are the time frames i liked most. but, the more i think back, i would have to say definately modern age. reason: by the time i got to the modern techs, i was either ending the game, or my science was at its peak during this time period and i would fly through the era. imo |
Atahualpa King of my castle (somewhere in at) Mar 99
|
 |
posted August 09, 2000 06:13
  |
 |
 |  |
With M.A.D. you just HAVE to have a Cold War Scenario!!!!!ATa |
Adm.Naismith Prince Milano - Italy Oct 1999
|
 |
posted August 09, 2000 07:59
|
 |
 |  |
I see almost every proposed scenario focused on war. While I agree that fighting in games can be very fun, I think that limiting CTPII (or any CIV like) game as a wargame is not making great use of its engine.I support ideas as Cold War, Napoleon, or Fallout-like, still I would like to see some scenario where war is not the main backbone. Just to suggest some theme: 1) run to the moon (discover the needed tech on appropriate tech tree, with or without other countries help, and having enough production points for enough time). It could be a variant of the Build the starship to Alpha Centauri, but starting right in modern era (after WWII). 2) italian renaissance (some little states deeply involved in trade, diplomatic move and limited fights, while arts and sciences grow to industrialization) 3) age of exploration (some limited and dedicated exporer units must survey - and survive to native encounter - every square of the globe) 4) save the earth (quickly solve a scenario where production is growth so high that pollution is almost out of control. Tune down production, improve eco-enhancement, clean up polluted area and save the world from global warming, trading and treating with less developed country to join your efforts) 5) world peacekeeping (stop every war using diplomacy, money or - as a last resource - your U.N. peacekeeping forces - in a defined turn limit, with the limit to free back every city you conquer in a few turns - you can't conquer the world just to force the peace) May be my suggestion are a bit crazy and have some limits to be implemented in an interesting way, but I would like to suggest a different point of view about this scenario approach. Any comments and critics are welcome. Supports and agreements are more welcome, indeed  ------------------ Admiral Naismith AKA mcostant [This message has been edited by Adm.Naismith (edited August 09, 2000).] |
TheBirdMan Prince Denmark Sep 1999
|
 |
posted August 09, 2000 08:04
  |
 |
 |  |
Europa at the times of French revolution and Napoleon. |
Changmai Beagle Settler The Great White North & warmer climes Oct 1999
|
 |
posted August 09, 2000 20:25
|
 |
 |  |
I like the idea of non-war scenarios as well as war-based scenarios. I'm not quite sure some of my choices fit as they are not modern or ancient. There are a number of interesting Empire/Colonial/Victorian periods. - Colonial North and South America - Colonial Africa and Asia - American Revolution (I enjoy playing the British in the CivII scenario) and Central and South American revolutions - Boxer Rebellion - etc. And since I lost or gave away my copy of Machiavelli (Italian Renaissance variant of Diplomacy) years ago I think that would make a neat scenario to play again. |
Atahualpa King of my castle (somewhere in at) Mar 99
|
 |
posted August 10, 2000 06:45
  |
 |
 |  |
Good point Naismith!I would also like some non-war scenario but well it should at least involve some fighting. Stacked Combat is just a great concept. But I agree I would definately like a "Colonization" Scenario. Maybe one where you dont start with a Settler somewhere, but with a Ship that has a Settler and a Musketeer loaded. So to say a "Colonization(tm)" cover. ata |
Diodorus Sicilus Warlord Steilacoom, WA, USA May 99
|
 |
posted August 10, 2000 22:41
 |
 |
 |  |
How about several Colonization - Exploration scenarios? 1. Ancient Greece - including such players as the Persians, Scythians, Carthaginians, or just a bunch of Greek city-states. You start with one or more tririmes, settler, phalanx or combo of above and a Home City. Idea is to establish more colonies than the opponent, which thrive and don't get "barbarianized". Modeled after the great Greek expansion of the 8-6 centuries BC. Call it the CtPII version of "Zeus" 2. A-Viking We Will Go: Start with a longship and crew, look for places to pillage, trade, or settle, points for most area covered as well as loot/trade brought home. Special Feature: Longship can be hauled overland with much effort for 1-2 tiles of flat (non-hill, non-mountain, non-cliff edge) terrain. Really special points if you manage to find and settle a whole new world (Vinland or Mexico, take your pick) 3. Age of Exploration. Using Spanish, Dutch, French, Venetian/Genoese, English, Portugese civs, try to plant colonies in either the New World or Africa/Asia, develop trade as well as new cities, fight "barbarian" natives or each other. To do this right, you're going to need a Carrack, Caravel, Cog, and/or Galleon unit for the appropriate naval ship. Other specialties: Spanish Conquistadors with effects of Monks against barbarians, European Monks that can only convert non-Europeans? In short, the CtPII version of Imperialism II or 1602 And finally, how about a scenario based on the Robber Barons or Monopolists of the nineteenth century? Goal would be to build railroads across a continent, Amass most money through trade, monopolies. Need rules for getting "trade concessions" from civs. Consider this a CtP version of "Railroad Tycoon". In other words, take advantage of the sprawling nature of the CtP subject to model features of other popular game-periods in the CtP mode, both combat and non-combat. Among "Combat" or Conquest scenarios, I suggest the Wars of Alexander's Successors (Ancient), Establishing the Persian Empire (Cyrus, also Ancient); Fall of Rome - everybody plays a barbarian "civ" and the Computer plays Rome; the First World War (the real one: 1757 to 1763 with Frederick the Great and England against everybody else from Europe to India and Ohio). Instead of WWI or WWII as separate scenarios, do The Twentieth Century: Germany, Britain, france, Russia, USA, Japan, China with Civil War/Revolution and Involuntary Government Change and see who survives from 1900 to 2001... |
Matthew Hayden Settler Great Britain Aug 2000
|
 |
posted August 12, 2000 18:22
 |
 |
 |  |
I'd like to see some WW2 campaigns, especially Rommels battles. Anyone know anything about the battle in North Africa. But anyway, this campaign would include major battles in some way ie; Tobruk, El Alamein. ACTIVISION, if you're listening, please include these or I will. Er. |
Grumbold Chieftain London, UK Mar 2000
|
 |
posted August 14, 2000 07:16
|
 |
 |  |
I'd be very surprised if the CtP2 team would be willing to model specific warfare campaigns accurately. Even redesigning the whole unit set to provide the different quality of infantry, armor, artillery and aircraft available during WW2 it is unlikely to be able to model the unique supply and other problems that existed during the desert campaign. Concepts like weather, fatigue, supply and morale are not relevant in the wider years-per-turn game. The sort of extra development these will require (assuming the code will support them) demand the time and patience only dedicated players can put in. |
Sophanthro Chieftain London, UK Mar 2000
|
 |
posted August 14, 2000 11:27
|
 |
 |  |
Hmm why does this thread always get displayed at the top of the Forum.I think Grumbolds right whatever scenarios Activision puts out will probably only use units already made for CTP, pity that. That doesn't mean that the scenarios won't be fun. Of course I can say it enough, if activision gives us the right tools we can make tons and tons of great scenarios. |
Palpatine Chieftain Marburg, Hessen, Germany Mar 99
|
 |
posted August 16, 2000 13:32
  |
 |
 |  |
My favourite scenarios are:1. Cold War 1985 (full world displayed) 2. WW2 3. Napoleon 4. MiddleEast 5. WW1 At least for the first two scenarios it wouldnt be necessary to create new units --> easy scenarios -The power of the dark side is with him- Emperor Palpatine |
Adam_Smith Prince The Raisin Capital of the World Dec 1999
|
 |
posted August 16, 2000 14:17
  |
 |
 |  |
I didn't vote, because I don't care for scenerios. So I would prefer that effort be put into other areas. |
Big Dave Prince Texas, USA Apr 99
|
 |
posted August 17, 2000 21:31
 |
 |
 |  |
quote:
 Originally posted by Sophanthro on 08-14-2000 11:27 AM Hmm why does this thread always get displayed at the top of the Forum.
 |
Mark has installed a hack that keeps the thread of his choice at the top of the forum. quote:
 I think Grumbolds right whatever scenarios Activision puts out will probably only use units already made for CTP, pity that. That doesn't mean that the scenarios won't be fun.Of course I can say it enough, if activision gives us the right tools we can make tons and tons of great scenarios.
 |
In reply to a comment of mine stating that if Activision were smart they'd have gotten some scenario builders here at Apolyton Lt. John said that we should recognize the names of some of the scenario builders. ------------------ Big Dave Failure is not an option It's bundled with the software |
DrDanger Prince Texas, USA Apr 99
|
 |
posted August 17, 2000 22:06
|
 |
 |  |
quote:
 Originally posted by MarkG on 08-07-2000 05:25 PM 1) an "all of the above" choice in this poll was useless. what good will such a vote mean? since you vote, it already means that you do want scenarios in the game...2) multiple choice or "weighted list" polls are not doable. in the end though, a weighted list will exist from the votes of all the people please choose the one you prefer the most and add a comment on what you might like second, etc...
 |
Mark..you are soo true..and YES!!.. A VOTE..constitutes..having a definitive ability to choose ONE!!!..but maybe more 2nd place choices..needed..or wanted..I agree with your assumption that "ALL-OF-THE-ABOVE"..doesnt fit well in a "VOTE"..category.
Keep up Great work keeping us Straight Partner!!! DrDanger..A.K.A.PATTON... FAILURE is an OPTION.... IT's BUNDLED up with Reality..in what I Call the REAL WORLD!!! |
DiscoveryOne Chieftain Atlanta, GA USA Feb 2000
|
 |
posted August 17, 2000 23:35
 |
 |
 |  |
I really hope that there are no fantasy/fictional scenarios included, excluding possible near-future ones. I know that I don't have to play them, but I see CTP as more of a historical simulation; if I want to play Tolkien, I'll get a LotR game. Although I have a feeling that Activision will include one scenario from each of the categories in the poll, my choices would be: December of 1941 The British Empire, Victorian period The Punic Wars The crusades (2nd-4th, probably) The Spanish vs. the Mexica Great to be back! |
ConquistadorPizzaro Settler Massachusetts, USA Aug 2000
|
 |
posted August 18, 2000 09:03
 |
 |
 |  |
There simply MUST be a cold war/MAD scenario. This is one of the most crucial and interesting times in history, and definetly is worthy of a scenario. And please, please, NO FANTASY OR OUTRAGOUS FICTIONAL SCENARIOS!!!!!------------------ "And it was destined that he should fall before the mighty hoof of our Lord and King of Spain." |
Big Dave Prince Texas, USA Apr 99
|
 |
posted August 20, 2000 08:34
 |
 |
 |  |
I disagree. I think that if there are 5 scenarios released with the game that a fantasy scenario would be very important. I wouldn't play it, I'm a history buff. But I feel that it would make a great sample for mod makers to show how to do things that might not be shown in other scenarios.------------------ Big Dave If a pig looses it's voice is it disgruntled? |
DrDanger Prince Texas, USA Apr 99
|
 |
posted August 20, 2000 14:22
|
 |
 |  |
quote:
 Originally posted by Big Dave on 08-20-2000 08:34 AM I disagree. I think that if there are 5 scenarios released with the game that a fantasy scenario would be very important. I wouldn't play it, I'm a history buff. But I feel that it would make a great sample for mod makers to show how to do things that might not be shown in other scenarios.

|
I have to Agree with Big Dave on this..After All..IF you have that Fantasy Scenario...you might be able to get some EXTRA info to alter or "MOD"..something that might fancy your interests!!..And Like BIG DAVE..I wouldn't play it..(maybe to see how it's put together)because I too enjoy History...!!
If they call an Orange an Orange........ Why dont they call a Banana a Yellow? (From Christopher Lloyd...on Taxi Series..asking his Father a question after not seeing him for years)
|
Atahualpa King of my castle (somewhere in at) Mar 99
|
 |
posted September 04, 2000 10:51
  |
 |
 |  |
So you wouldnt even give it a try?I think releasing scenarios WITH the main game is a great idea! Not that again we get them promised with a patch! And I hope this time Activision will not cut off support after the 2nd patch. I hope they keep on working on it and even if there are no bugs they could release maps and/or scenarios. Or maybe some official Mods. aTa |
PRoy Settler houston, texas, usa Sep 2000
|
 |
posted September 08, 2000 21:30
  |
 |
 |  |
Perhaps instead of having scenarios that start at the beginning of a war, they could have some that start at a historical point of relative peace, perhaps at the end of a major war.I would certainly like to see a "modern" whole-world scenario that starts at the time of the formation of the Germany and Italy (circa 1870). I'd like to see an American colonies scenario with a map of eastern North America, starting around 1600, and including scheduled landings of settlers in historically accurate times/locations, including Natives, English, French, Dutch and Spanish, and with some kind of trigger that causes a revolt, after which time you have the option of playing the role of the revolting colonists instead of the mother country. I would like to see an expansion of Rome scenario with a map that covers the historical max extent of the empire, but that starts with Rome controlling at most the Italian peninsula, perhaps much earlier. I'd like to see a Dark Ages scenario that covers western Europe and includes major tribes and civilizations including Visigoths, Ostriogoths, Franks, Vandals, and Romans. As the Roman you would try to minimize the onslaught, and as a Germanic tribe you would try to establish a sizeable feudal monarchy. I'd like to see an Age of Exploration scenario starting circa 1500 where your goal at the English, Spanish, Portuguese, French or Dutch is to colonize the New World, Africa and Southeast Asia/Pacific. (The previous American one is specifically intended to lead to a revolution.) In the past I would be eager for Napoleonic, WWI and WWII scenarios, but I am more eager to play scenarios where trade and diplomacy are central. |
Stratesford Chieftain Guanajuato, Mexico Sep 2000
|
 |
posted September 09, 2000 19:29
|
 |
 |  |
I think one scenario that should be included is the latin american revolutions against Spain, since it icludes war, deplomacy and trade. Or the rise of rome |
Sophanthro Chieftain Guanajuato, Mexico Sep 2000
|
 |
posted September 13, 2000 02:56
|
 |
 |  |
Maybe this is the wrong place to post this but does anyone know if there are going more than the three scenarios announced in IGN's designer diary?Cold War, WWII, and Alexander the Great |
Seeker King Canada(UWO) b.02-15-99
|
 |
posted September 27, 2000 00:17
  |
 |
 |  |
Cold War, at the time of the Cuban Missile CrisisAge of Imperialism (1815-1918) |
Bkeela Prince Brisbane, Australia Oct 1999
|
 |
posted September 30, 2000 12:05
|
 |
 |  |
I would like to see a Mars senario. If Civ 2 can do it, I don't see why CTP II can't.Bkeela. |
Stratesford Chieftain Guanajuato, Mexico Sep 2000
|
 |
posted October 01, 2000 04:57
|
 |
 |  |
don't worry when ctp2 comes out with it's new scenario building capabilities I'll make one |
DrDanger Chieftain Guanajuato, Mexico Sep 2000
|
 |
posted October 07, 2000 16:26
|
 |
 |  |
Here's a REALLY K-E-W-L Scenario..Lets call it the "Dumbito El Deuce"...and being a scenario...its based on BIG 'Ole Dumb-Butts..who bang there head against Walls..like the Fictious City of Activision...Now they could have the option of moving on toward another city but all they do is Bang them thar Hard Hollow Heads..lets say that the leader of this Dumb-Butt Clan is..hmm..a really simple Name....like DAVE!!..yeah and they are from a southern Region..well the "Big 'Ole Dumb-Butt Dave Insists on attacking Activision...but to no avail...  The Fictious City of Activision had previously made an error..in the construction of the wall..but has since learned and now has a superior wall....and Loyalist subjects...like DrDanger....Fervently and Passionatly Defend The City of Activision....and dump pails of Dung on those who would attempt to Dishonor her!!!!!!! LOL..what ya think..eh?..c'mon..wouldnt this be a great scenario? P.S.... I do hope that all you folks understand this would be only a scenario..because I'm sure this would stir too much controversy within the "Big 'Ole Dumb-butts community" JUST FOOLIN..... 
God Bless Brother Bruce
DrDanger.. The current Red October..The Former Patton!! Quote Just like my hero from Texas) Over the Hills and thru the wooods.. A Humorous Bone I seek |
LooseWasp Settler Massachusetts Oct 2000
|
 |
posted October 12, 2000 12:58
 |
 |
 |  |
How about an Inquisition scenario? You'd have a civilization of witches who win if they convert the capitol city (Madrid, eg); the Spaniards win if they exterminate the witches. The witches would have bizarre mostly stealth type attacks with unpredictable results...turning soldier units into cattle, cursing land so it yields no resources, or cursing units to paralyze them or give a combat penalty for a few rounds. In more general terms, a scenario where the different civs have very different units, so that the idea of combat changes depending on what civ you're playing. This gets away from the "the Cubans are just like the Americans only with different city names and pictures" problem. |
Grand Master Fe Long Chieftain St Albans, Herts, England Apr 99
|
 |
posted October 14, 2000 08:40
 |
 |
 |  |
I want to see scenarios to be included like - The crusades, ww1, ww2, the high of the cold war and it turning hot. the breaking up of yugoslavia, and a war between India and Pakistan since they both got nukes and and have nearly already been at full scale war. in short i want to see a scenario with lots of warfare! what dose everyone else thing about these examples? |
John Amram Settler London, UK Oct 2000
|
 |
posted October 19, 2000 08:45
 |
 |
 |  |
My current level: Deity once. Emperor numerous.Scenarios are great - would love to see: WWII: Everybody want to kick Adolph's butt - this scenario must be executed brilliantly. Future battles in space: Space cities and all associated units. Must be great fun. Namaste Johnny
|
El Xadier Settler Leipzig, Sachsen, Germany Oct 2000
|
 |
posted October 21, 2000 13:09
 |
 |
 |  |
would love to see the Scenarios to the WWI & WWII.hmmm... maybee the "Dark Time" in 400 A.D. |
Paulypav Chieftain Rocky Point, NY, USA Oct 2000
|
 |
posted October 21, 2000 23:22
 |
 |
 |  |
I really enjoy scenarios and would like to see a number of them created in all areas. Some ideas:WWII a must. MAD - India/Pakistan is intriguing, Cold War, Middle East. Age of Exploration Crusades Dark Ages |
SorvinoBackhand Settler Ohio Sep 2000
|
 |
posted October 24, 2000 02:14
  |
 |
 |  |
Classical Greece: the Persian invasions and the Peloponnesian WarNuclear Scenarios: the Cuban Missile Crisis ------------------ [This message has been edited by SorvinoBackhand (edited October 24, 2000).] [This message has been edited by SorvinoBackhand (edited October 24, 2000).] |
Bartemans Chieftain Deventer, Overijssel, Netherlands Oct 2000
|
 |
posted October 24, 2000 15:06
  |
 |
 |  |
When is the fifth pole coming up?I can't wait to click on a button with VOTE on it (I'm not an American and election in the Netherlands are still two years away, so I must have some substitute on this site) Bye, Bartemans http://home.hccnet.nl/stolte.1
|
Chris B Settler Ct, USA Oct 2000
|
 |
posted October 24, 2000 20:07
 |
 |
 |  |
I want all kinds of scenarios, but I voted for fantasy because I've never seen a fantasy scenario. I also want lots of extra units and governments in my scenarios. Civ has too few governments, and more units always spice up the game. |
Dida Warlord
Jan 2000
|
 |
posted October 29, 2000 01:26
 |
 |
 |  |
WWII is a must. |