|
Author
|
|
Topic: More results from nearly pointless studies |  |
|
Caesar the Great
b.02-15-99
|
 |
posted March 13, 2000 17:54
 |
 |
 |  |
I just play tested a game in which on a small map, 3 human players, x2 production global warming came after 17 turns, and 80!! poluted spaces... what are your reactions to this. If you want a copy of the last save I have it. But there are a lot of poluted squares, apparently too many for a SMALL world map... maybe x2 production affects it, well once I get some more time I'll test that too.Credits: Caesar the Great: For spending an hour of his time to make this testing scenario. Kengel and Wezil: For taking about 15 minutes to help test this scenario. rah: The man who gave me the idea (indirectly). The brother of the all powerful merciless god-like moderator of these forums  |
War4ever
b.02-15-99
|
 |
posted March 13, 2000 20:41
 |
 |
 |  |
wow 80 squares eh??? so much for the nine square belief or whatever it was...... |
rah
b.02-15-99
|
 |
posted March 13, 2000 22:45
 |
 |
 |  |
rah take a bow, (inderectly of course). But one question remains. Was it because of some limit to the number of polution squares on the board (or even a ratio to non poluted) or was ot because a smaller number existed prior and just weren't clean up in a reasonable time? We had lots of polution in our game, but we were cleaning it up.But thank you for the effort, it is much more information than prior. Maybe this weekend, I can test it a little also. RAH Even the ferrets were impressed with the quick responses. | |