posted May 24, 1999 19:46
Gentlemen, quite frankly, I absolutely can't understand all this buzz about which civ is to be included - no, really!I'd be satisfid with just 8 civs - PLUS AN OPTION TO EASILY ADD ONE MYSELF. That's it. CIV2 was already near to it: I could give myself a name, tell the comp what's the name of my people, could even outline the titles for various governments - hey, what else do you want??? All that's needed is an option to save those names and a city list, if so desired... who cares if the Germans are in from the beginning? If they are not, I'll implant them. Fullspot.
No, what I think is more important is the thing about civs having different attributes. What I propose is having a set of personalities / advantages / disadvantages which are randomly assign for each game. A human player can pick a civ and a personality set.
Be honest, it's a bit silly to assign e.g. "aggressive" to a whole civilization and associate that with the name, isn't it? Why are the Indians peaceful? Only because there was a Ghandi? Come on...
So this would be the solution for allowing an unlimited number of civs while not offending anyone by associating "his" civ with negative attributes.
------------------
Well, if we took the bones out they wouldn't be crunchy, would they?