Apolyton Archive  |  Preserved copy of the Apolyton Civilization Site forums as they ran on Ultimate Bulletin Board, 1998–2001. Read-only; nothing here can be posted to or replied to.  |  Forum index |  About this archive |  The 2005 site & forums

  Apolyton Civilization Site Forums
  Civ2-General/Community
  Civilization a War Game or Historical Simulation?

Post New Topic  Post A ReplyPost A Reply In A New Window

profile | register | preferences | faq | search next newest topic | next oldest topic bottom of page
Author Topic:   Civilization a War Game or Historical Simulation?            Current Date/Time: June 12, 2000 10:50:05
LordGrey
Chieftain
Northeast USA
b.02-15-99
posted June 10, 2000 20:09   Click Here to See the Profile for LordGreyClick Here to Email LordGrey
Edit/Delete Message    Reply To And Quote This Message
IP: Logged, Admin Access Only
MisterHungry's great column of last month about whether or not Civilization is really a simulation of all history and if such a thing is possible really got me thinking. You see I had thought about this to, and the above column helped me to clarify some of those thoughts. This brings me to raise a question touched upon by MH.

Is Civilization a historical simulation or is it a war game, such as Risk, with the added element of time marching on?

Me, I am somewhat torn. Ancient wonders, technological advance and interaction between civilizations are evidence of a simulation. But all of those things can seem part of the conflict as they give advantages in the struggle, so maybe it is a war game, albeit a very nuanced one with the trappings of world history.

If anyone finds this a thought provoking question, the abovementioned column on this site delves into similar problems to much greater effect.

Smash
King
Vancouver Canada PST
Jul 1999
posted June 11, 2000 17:09   Click Here to See the Profile for Smash  Send a Message to UIN: 43016264
Edit/Delete Message    Reply To And Quote This Message
IP: Logged, Admin Access Only
I think its kinda of a combo of the 2 plus more.

Risk takes planning but the actual battles are a roll of the dice.In civ you have more military influence thru technology.You can research better quality units which will be decisive in battle.

The fact that you can win without ever firing a shot,or form alliances,or engage in peaceful trade and negotiations brings the simulation part into it.Although this is far from perfect as far as the AI is concerned.

And the fact that these 2 "sides" of the game go hand in hand along with other "sides" make a truly great game.Civ2 and MGE are the only games I have that have made it past 6 months of play.

not to mention the exploration side

Steve Clark
Prince
Colorado Springs, CO
Oct 1999
posted June 12, 2000 10:50   Click Here to See the Profile for Steve Clark 
Edit/Delete Message    Reply To And Quote This Message
IP: Logged, Admin Access Only
IMO, neither. It's a unique civilization-building game. Other games do city-building, warfare, historical simulating, trading, diplomacy, exploring, etc. better, but when combined, no game does all of these as well as Civ2.
Apolyton Civilization Site Forums
> > > Civ2-General/Community Forum

next newest topic | next oldest topictop of page

All times are EDT

Administrative Options: Close Topic | Archive/Move | Delete Topic
Post New Topic  Post A ReplyPost A Reply In A New Window
Hop to:

Contact Us
Apolyton Civilization Site

Powered by: Ultimate Bulletin Board, Version 5.44a
© Infopop Corporation (formerly Madrona Park, Inc.), 1998 - 2000.

Front Page | Civilization III | Dinosaurs | Civilization II | Call to Power | Call to Power II | Alpha Centauri | Alternative Civs | Misc | Links | About ACS | GameStats
GameLeague | Scenario League | Hodadian Award Central | Civilization Scenario Collection | Spanish CivII Site | Clash of Civs | CtP Maps