|
Author
|
Topic: powergraph Current Date/Time:
April 11, 2000 03:26:01
|
Rusty Nail Chieftain From: Copenhagen, Denmark Registered: b.02-15-99
|
 |
posted March 07, 2000 12:44

|
 |

|
Does anyone know the exact(or approximate) formula for calculating the powergraph? Maybe there is some previous discussion of this in the forums, but I have not seen it. (it is relevant in the Swiss style game league tournaments.) |
finbar Prince From: Sydney, Australia Registered: Jul 1999
|
 |
posted March 07, 2000 23:27

|
 |

|
No one has a definitive answer and it's been much debated. The consensus seems to be that population has a large say.------------------ finbar Mono Rules! #33984591 |
Comrade Dan King From: That's for me to know and you to find out. Registered: Nov 1999
|
 |
posted March 08, 2000 01:26
|
 |

|
I find it really inaccurate. Many times I made my own score plateau (flat line at the top), then a few extra points get down to cardiac arrest. |
Cam Scenario League From: Australia Registered: b.02-15-99
|
 |
posted March 08, 2000 01:41

|
 |

|
Refer to: apolyton.net/forums/Archives/Archive-000005/HTML/20000207-3-000365.html  |
DaveV Prince From: USA - EDT Registered: b.02-15-99
|
 |
posted March 08, 2000 07:51

|
 |

|
Nice find, Cam. I searched for that thread, but didn't think to look in the archives. My one quibble with the formula as posted by AS is that I think wonders also have an impact on the powergraph. Many games, I've seen my powergraph shoot up after I build a wonder, without any major changes in the other factors. |
Scouse Gits Prince From: Liverpool, United Kingdom Registered: Nov 1999
|
 |
posted March 09, 2000 06:24
|
 |

|
Am I missing something here - as far as I was aware the only ways to review the powergraph are to complete the game or to retire. How come you guys are keeping track of it?  ------------------ ____________ Scouse Git[1] "CARTAGO DELENDA EST" - Cato the Censor |
SlowHand Warlord From: Dallas, Texas Central U.S. time -6 Registered: Jan 2000
|
 |
posted March 09, 2000 07:09
|
 |

|
Graph taken from demographics. |
DaveV Prince From: USA - EDT Registered: b.02-15-99
|
 |
posted March 09, 2000 07:35

|
 |

|
SG1 - I can't speak for the others, but I tend to play my games in 1-hour chunks. This means I quit/retire and restore several times in the course of a normal game. I usually quit these days so I don't learn any unauthorized information, but I had no such compunctions in my earlier days.SlowHand - as I understand it, the only way to see the powergraph in demographics is to enable cheat mode, reveal the whole map, and check civ score. Do you have a different technique? |
Bohlen Chieftain From: Columbus, Ohio, USA EST Registered: Nov 1999
|
 |
posted March 09, 2000 14:20

|
 |

|
Just finished a my best AC game yet, as I landed on AC before any of the other 6 civs launched. I was thrilled...very little war, spotless reputation, and a win to boot! Then the powergraph came up and my Americans were 4th! 4th? My best AC game ever and my final score & % did not show my hard work. It doesn't really matter to me how it is calculated. The powergraph and scoring system are both crap. |
War4ever King From: Vancouver, B.C. Canada PST Registered: Oct 1999
|
 |
posted March 09, 2000 15:52

|
 |

|
i was under the impression that once you landed the powergraph topped out on the screen? am i wrong in this assumption  |
Smash King From: Vancouver Canada PST Registered: Jul 1999
|
 |
posted March 09, 2000 16:34
|
 |

|
yes,you are wrong. in OCC you never come anywhere near the top |
Comrade Dan King From: That's for me to know and you to find out. Registered: Nov 1999
|
 |
posted March 10, 2000 02:39
|
 |

|
To hell with this! Just trust your numerical score. |
SlowHand Warlord From: Dallas, Texas Central U.S. time -6 Registered: Jan 2000
|
 |
posted March 10, 2000 07:16
|
 |

|
I'm just talking World, Demographics Dave. |
Sieve Too Prince From: New Hampshire, USA Registered: b.02-15-99
|
 |
posted March 10, 2000 08:02

|
 |

|
Forget both the powergraph AND the numerical score. Both seem to be weighted too much towards population, which IMHO should count almost not at all. |